Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?

© 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH This study demonstrates sexual dimorphism of feline bones, based on a morphometric analysis of 38 dried feline skulls and pelvic bones (20 males, 18 females). A total of 44 parameters (skull = 12, mandible = 10, pelvis = 22) were measured using a digital vernier calliper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Pitakarnnop, K. Buddhachat, T. Euppayo, W. Kriangwanich, K. Nganvongpanit
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85014922203&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57943
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-57943
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-579432018-09-05T03:55:13Z Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference? T. Pitakarnnop K. Buddhachat T. Euppayo W. Kriangwanich K. Nganvongpanit Veterinary © 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH This study demonstrates sexual dimorphism of feline bones, based on a morphometric analysis of 38 dried feline skulls and pelvic bones (20 males, 18 females). A total of 44 parameters (skull = 12, mandible = 10, pelvis = 22) were measured using a digital vernier calliper. In morphological observation of these bones, there were three hallmarks indicating a remarkable difference between sexes: the coronoid process of the mandible (accuracy rate = 88.2%); and the os coxae – caudal ventral iliac spine (accuracy rate = 94.4%), and the angle of the ischiatic arch (accuracy rate = 74.3%). In addition, based on morphometric characteristics, six parameters were found to be significantly different (P < 0.05) between males and females, consisting of one in the mandible and five in the pelvis, but no parameters in the skull. Effective equations to discriminate gender were generated through a stepwise discriminant analysis from feline mandible and pelvic bones. Our findings showed that an equation from the pelvic bones, Y = [−16.066*T/O] + [2.559*IC/PS] + [13.357*TTL/ISA] − [4.478], appeared to be more applicable with a 97.3% accuracy rate, while a function from the mandible gave a 64.9% accuracy rate. In conclusion, we suggest that an equation from feline pelvic measurements and three hallmarks, one on the mandible and two on the os coxae, can be used for sex estimation. 2018-09-05T03:55:13Z 2018-09-05T03:55:13Z 2017-06-01 Journal 14390264 03402096 2-s2.0-85014922203 10.1111/ahe.12269 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85014922203&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57943
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Veterinary
spellingShingle Veterinary
T. Pitakarnnop
K. Buddhachat
T. Euppayo
W. Kriangwanich
K. Nganvongpanit
Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?
description © 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH This study demonstrates sexual dimorphism of feline bones, based on a morphometric analysis of 38 dried feline skulls and pelvic bones (20 males, 18 females). A total of 44 parameters (skull = 12, mandible = 10, pelvis = 22) were measured using a digital vernier calliper. In morphological observation of these bones, there were three hallmarks indicating a remarkable difference between sexes: the coronoid process of the mandible (accuracy rate = 88.2%); and the os coxae – caudal ventral iliac spine (accuracy rate = 94.4%), and the angle of the ischiatic arch (accuracy rate = 74.3%). In addition, based on morphometric characteristics, six parameters were found to be significantly different (P < 0.05) between males and females, consisting of one in the mandible and five in the pelvis, but no parameters in the skull. Effective equations to discriminate gender were generated through a stepwise discriminant analysis from feline mandible and pelvic bones. Our findings showed that an equation from the pelvic bones, Y = [−16.066*T/O] + [2.559*IC/PS] + [13.357*TTL/ISA] − [4.478], appeared to be more applicable with a 97.3% accuracy rate, while a function from the mandible gave a 64.9% accuracy rate. In conclusion, we suggest that an equation from feline pelvic measurements and three hallmarks, one on the mandible and two on the os coxae, can be used for sex estimation.
format Journal
author T. Pitakarnnop
K. Buddhachat
T. Euppayo
W. Kriangwanich
K. Nganvongpanit
author_facet T. Pitakarnnop
K. Buddhachat
T. Euppayo
W. Kriangwanich
K. Nganvongpanit
author_sort T. Pitakarnnop
title Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?
title_short Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?
title_full Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?
title_fullStr Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?
title_full_unstemmed Feline (Felis catus) Skull and Pelvic Morphology and Morphometry: Gender-Related Difference?
title_sort feline (felis catus) skull and pelvic morphology and morphometry: gender-related difference?
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85014922203&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57943
_version_ 1681424972897058816