Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery

© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis. Purpose: To report a case of recovery of a medial rectus which was accidentally disinserted after surgical treatment of a recurrent pterygium. Method: Report of a case of inadvertent medial rectus disinsertion after pterygium excision at a secondary care hospit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prapatsorn Patikulsila, Atitaya Apivatthakakul, Kasem Seresirikachorn
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045761991&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58873
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-58873
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-588732018-09-05T04:34:25Z Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery Prapatsorn Patikulsila Atitaya Apivatthakakul Kasem Seresirikachorn Medicine © 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis. Purpose: To report a case of recovery of a medial rectus which was accidentally disinserted after surgical treatment of a recurrent pterygium. Method: Report of a case of inadvertent medial rectus disinsertion after pterygium excision at a secondary care hospital which was referred to a tertiary care hospital in Northern Thailand. Result: A 40-year-old healthy woman was referred by a general ophthalmologist at a secondary care center to our hospital. She had undergone recurrent pterygium excision with amniotic membrane transplantation on the nasal side of her right eye. Immediately after the last operation, she complained of horizontal binocular diplopia. On the first postoperative day, the patient could not adduct the eye beyond the primary position. Her measurements in primary position were 45 prism diopters of right exotropia on distant and near. The diagnosis of iatrogenic medial rectus disinsertion was made. Three weeks after pterygium excision, revision surgery was performed; the medial rectus was found and reattached to its normal insertion site. On the first postoperative day, the patient referred a small vertical diplopia in the primary position. Orthoptic examination five months post-operatively demonstrated orthotropia and absence of diplopia in primary position, but minimal horizontal diplopia in right gaze. Conclusions: Accidental rectus muscle disinsertion after pterygium excision surgery is a serious but rare postoperative complication of pterygium surgery. Great care should be taken intraoperatively to avoid this complication. Reattachment of the disinserted medial rectus will produce a satisfactory resolution of the problem. 2018-09-05T04:34:25Z 2018-09-05T04:34:25Z 2018-07-03 Journal 17445132 09273972 2-s2.0-85045761991 10.1080/09273972.2018.1465104 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045761991&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58873
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Prapatsorn Patikulsila
Atitaya Apivatthakakul
Kasem Seresirikachorn
Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery
description © 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis. Purpose: To report a case of recovery of a medial rectus which was accidentally disinserted after surgical treatment of a recurrent pterygium. Method: Report of a case of inadvertent medial rectus disinsertion after pterygium excision at a secondary care hospital which was referred to a tertiary care hospital in Northern Thailand. Result: A 40-year-old healthy woman was referred by a general ophthalmologist at a secondary care center to our hospital. She had undergone recurrent pterygium excision with amniotic membrane transplantation on the nasal side of her right eye. Immediately after the last operation, she complained of horizontal binocular diplopia. On the first postoperative day, the patient could not adduct the eye beyond the primary position. Her measurements in primary position were 45 prism diopters of right exotropia on distant and near. The diagnosis of iatrogenic medial rectus disinsertion was made. Three weeks after pterygium excision, revision surgery was performed; the medial rectus was found and reattached to its normal insertion site. On the first postoperative day, the patient referred a small vertical diplopia in the primary position. Orthoptic examination five months post-operatively demonstrated orthotropia and absence of diplopia in primary position, but minimal horizontal diplopia in right gaze. Conclusions: Accidental rectus muscle disinsertion after pterygium excision surgery is a serious but rare postoperative complication of pterygium surgery. Great care should be taken intraoperatively to avoid this complication. Reattachment of the disinserted medial rectus will produce a satisfactory resolution of the problem.
format Journal
author Prapatsorn Patikulsila
Atitaya Apivatthakakul
Kasem Seresirikachorn
author_facet Prapatsorn Patikulsila
Atitaya Apivatthakakul
Kasem Seresirikachorn
author_sort Prapatsorn Patikulsila
title Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery
title_short Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery
title_full Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery
title_fullStr Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Recovery of a Disinserted Medial Rectus Muscle after Pterygium Surgery
title_sort recovery of a disinserted medial rectus muscle after pterygium surgery
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045761991&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58873
_version_ 1681425146740473856