Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia
For centuries swidden was an important farming practice found across the girth of Southeast Asia. Today, however, these systems are changing and sometimes disappearing at a pace never before experienced. In order to explain the demise or transitioning of swidden we need to understand the rapid and m...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651174310&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59329 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-59329 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-593292018-09-10T03:25:45Z Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia Jefferson Fox Yayoi Fujita Dimbab Ngidang Nancy Peluso Lesley Potter Niken Sakuntaladewi Janet Sturgeon David Thomas Arts and Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences For centuries swidden was an important farming practice found across the girth of Southeast Asia. Today, however, these systems are changing and sometimes disappearing at a pace never before experienced. In order to explain the demise or transitioning of swidden we need to understand the rapid and massive changes that have and are occurring in the political and economic environment in which these farmers operate. Swidden farming has always been characterized by change, but since the onset of modern independent nation states, governments and markets in Southeast Asia have transformed the terms of swiddeners' everyday lives to a degree that is significantly different from that ever experienced before. In this paper we identified six factors that have contributed to the demise or transformation of swidden systems, and support these arguments with examples from China (Xishuangbanna), Laos, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. These trends include classifying swiddeners as ethnic minorities within nation-states, dividing the landscape into forest and permanent agriculture, expansion of forest departments and the rise of conservation, resettlement, privatization and commoditization of land and land-based production, and expansion of market infrastructure and the promotion of industrial agriculture. In addition we note a growing trend toward a transition from rural to urban livelihoods and expanding urban-labor markets. 2018-09-10T03:13:51Z 2018-09-10T03:13:51Z 2009-05-19 Journal 03007839 2-s2.0-67651174310 10.1007/s10745-009-9240-7 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651174310&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59329 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
topic |
Arts and Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences Jefferson Fox Yayoi Fujita Dimbab Ngidang Nancy Peluso Lesley Potter Niken Sakuntaladewi Janet Sturgeon David Thomas Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia |
description |
For centuries swidden was an important farming practice found across the girth of Southeast Asia. Today, however, these systems are changing and sometimes disappearing at a pace never before experienced. In order to explain the demise or transitioning of swidden we need to understand the rapid and massive changes that have and are occurring in the political and economic environment in which these farmers operate. Swidden farming has always been characterized by change, but since the onset of modern independent nation states, governments and markets in Southeast Asia have transformed the terms of swiddeners' everyday lives to a degree that is significantly different from that ever experienced before. In this paper we identified six factors that have contributed to the demise or transformation of swidden systems, and support these arguments with examples from China (Xishuangbanna), Laos, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. These trends include classifying swiddeners as ethnic minorities within nation-states, dividing the landscape into forest and permanent agriculture, expansion of forest departments and the rise of conservation, resettlement, privatization and commoditization of land and land-based production, and expansion of market infrastructure and the promotion of industrial agriculture. In addition we note a growing trend toward a transition from rural to urban livelihoods and expanding urban-labor markets. |
format |
Journal |
author |
Jefferson Fox Yayoi Fujita Dimbab Ngidang Nancy Peluso Lesley Potter Niken Sakuntaladewi Janet Sturgeon David Thomas |
author_facet |
Jefferson Fox Yayoi Fujita Dimbab Ngidang Nancy Peluso Lesley Potter Niken Sakuntaladewi Janet Sturgeon David Thomas |
author_sort |
Jefferson Fox |
title |
Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia |
title_short |
Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia |
title_full |
Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia |
title_fullStr |
Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asia |
title_sort |
policies, political-economy, and swidden in southeast asia |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651174310&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59329 |
_version_ |
1681425231011381248 |