Hydropower development priority using MCDM method

Hydropower is recognized as a renewable and clean energy sources and its potential should be realized in an environmentally sustainable and socially equitable manner. Traditionally, the decision criteria when analyzing hydropower projects, have been mostly a technical and economical analysis which f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thanaporn Supriyasilp, Kobkiat Pongput, Thana Boonyasirikul
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=63249113249&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59550
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-59550
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-595502018-09-10T03:18:09Z Hydropower development priority using MCDM method Thanaporn Supriyasilp Kobkiat Pongput Thana Boonyasirikul Energy Environmental Science Hydropower is recognized as a renewable and clean energy sources and its potential should be realized in an environmentally sustainable and socially equitable manner. Traditionally, the decision criteria when analyzing hydropower projects, have been mostly a technical and economical analysis which focused on the production of electricity. However, environmental awareness and sensitivity to locally affected people should also be considered. Multi-criteria decision analysis has been applied to study the potential to develop hydropower projects with electric power greater than 100 kW in the Ping River Basin, Thailand, and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the projects in five main criteria: electricity generation, engineering and economics, socio-economics, environment, and stakeholder involvement. There are 64 potential sites in the study area. Criteria weights have been discussed and assigned by expert groups for each main criteria and subcriteria. As a consequence of weight assignment, the environmental aspect is the most important aspect in the view of the experts. Two scenarios using expert weight and fair weight have been studied to determine the priority for development of each project. This study has been done to assist policy making for hydropower development in the Ping River Basin. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2018-09-10T03:17:01Z 2018-09-10T03:17:01Z 2009-05-01 Journal 03014215 2-s2.0-63249113249 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.023 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=63249113249&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59550
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Energy
Environmental Science
spellingShingle Energy
Environmental Science
Thanaporn Supriyasilp
Kobkiat Pongput
Thana Boonyasirikul
Hydropower development priority using MCDM method
description Hydropower is recognized as a renewable and clean energy sources and its potential should be realized in an environmentally sustainable and socially equitable manner. Traditionally, the decision criteria when analyzing hydropower projects, have been mostly a technical and economical analysis which focused on the production of electricity. However, environmental awareness and sensitivity to locally affected people should also be considered. Multi-criteria decision analysis has been applied to study the potential to develop hydropower projects with electric power greater than 100 kW in the Ping River Basin, Thailand, and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the projects in five main criteria: electricity generation, engineering and economics, socio-economics, environment, and stakeholder involvement. There are 64 potential sites in the study area. Criteria weights have been discussed and assigned by expert groups for each main criteria and subcriteria. As a consequence of weight assignment, the environmental aspect is the most important aspect in the view of the experts. Two scenarios using expert weight and fair weight have been studied to determine the priority for development of each project. This study has been done to assist policy making for hydropower development in the Ping River Basin. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
format Journal
author Thanaporn Supriyasilp
Kobkiat Pongput
Thana Boonyasirikul
author_facet Thanaporn Supriyasilp
Kobkiat Pongput
Thana Boonyasirikul
author_sort Thanaporn Supriyasilp
title Hydropower development priority using MCDM method
title_short Hydropower development priority using MCDM method
title_full Hydropower development priority using MCDM method
title_fullStr Hydropower development priority using MCDM method
title_full_unstemmed Hydropower development priority using MCDM method
title_sort hydropower development priority using mcdm method
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=63249113249&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59550
_version_ 1681425272059985920