Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line

Although several methods for extracting and handling membrane proteins for proteomics experiments have been reported, the direct comparison of different methods has never been clarified for the identifying membrane proteome in lung cancer cell lines. This study was purposed to find a protocol suitab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piyorot Hongsachart, Supachok Sinchaikul, Suree Phutrakul, Weerah Wongkham, Shui Tein Chen
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650702121&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-60152
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-601522018-09-10T03:48:18Z Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line Piyorot Hongsachart Supachok Sinchaikul Suree Phutrakul Weerah Wongkham Shui Tein Chen Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Chemistry Materials Science Mathematics Physics and Astronomy Although several methods for extracting and handling membrane proteins for proteomics experiments have been reported, the direct comparison of different methods has never been clarified for the identifying membrane proteome in lung cancer cell lines. This study was purposed to find a protocol suitable for membrane protein extraction and to identify the membrane proteome in lung cancer. Three detergent-based extraction methods including sequential detergent extraction using Triton X-100 and digitonin, Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation were used to enrich the membrane proteins from SW900 squamous lung cancer cell line. The membrane protein profiles separated by SDS-PAGE and two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) were compared. Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit was our preferable method which showed the highest number of protein spots, compared to the other methods, and the good resolution of membrane protein separation on the prote n profile. The three membrane protein profiles from three extraction methods showed 73 matched protein spots, in which 15 membrane proteins were successfully identified by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS analyses and served as membrane proteome which played an important role in squamous lung cancer. 2018-09-10T03:38:45Z 2018-09-10T03:38:45Z 2008-09-01 Journal 01252526 2-s2.0-67650702121 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650702121&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60152
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Materials Science
Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Materials Science
Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
Piyorot Hongsachart
Supachok Sinchaikul
Suree Phutrakul
Weerah Wongkham
Shui Tein Chen
Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
description Although several methods for extracting and handling membrane proteins for proteomics experiments have been reported, the direct comparison of different methods has never been clarified for the identifying membrane proteome in lung cancer cell lines. This study was purposed to find a protocol suitable for membrane protein extraction and to identify the membrane proteome in lung cancer. Three detergent-based extraction methods including sequential detergent extraction using Triton X-100 and digitonin, Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation were used to enrich the membrane proteins from SW900 squamous lung cancer cell line. The membrane protein profiles separated by SDS-PAGE and two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) were compared. Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit was our preferable method which showed the highest number of protein spots, compared to the other methods, and the good resolution of membrane protein separation on the prote n profile. The three membrane protein profiles from three extraction methods showed 73 matched protein spots, in which 15 membrane proteins were successfully identified by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS analyses and served as membrane proteome which played an important role in squamous lung cancer.
format Journal
author Piyorot Hongsachart
Supachok Sinchaikul
Suree Phutrakul
Weerah Wongkham
Shui Tein Chen
author_facet Piyorot Hongsachart
Supachok Sinchaikul
Suree Phutrakul
Weerah Wongkham
Shui Tein Chen
author_sort Piyorot Hongsachart
title Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
title_short Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
title_full Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
title_fullStr Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
title_full_unstemmed Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
title_sort comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of sw900 squamous lung cancer cell line
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650702121&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60152
_version_ 1681425383090552832