Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line
Although several methods for extracting and handling membrane proteins for proteomics experiments have been reported, the direct comparison of different methods has never been clarified for the identifying membrane proteome in lung cancer cell lines. This study was purposed to find a protocol suitab...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650702121&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60152 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-60152 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-601522018-09-10T03:48:18Z Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line Piyorot Hongsachart Supachok Sinchaikul Suree Phutrakul Weerah Wongkham Shui Tein Chen Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Chemistry Materials Science Mathematics Physics and Astronomy Although several methods for extracting and handling membrane proteins for proteomics experiments have been reported, the direct comparison of different methods has never been clarified for the identifying membrane proteome in lung cancer cell lines. This study was purposed to find a protocol suitable for membrane protein extraction and to identify the membrane proteome in lung cancer. Three detergent-based extraction methods including sequential detergent extraction using Triton X-100 and digitonin, Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation were used to enrich the membrane proteins from SW900 squamous lung cancer cell line. The membrane protein profiles separated by SDS-PAGE and two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) were compared. Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit was our preferable method which showed the highest number of protein spots, compared to the other methods, and the good resolution of membrane protein separation on the prote n profile. The three membrane protein profiles from three extraction methods showed 73 matched protein spots, in which 15 membrane proteins were successfully identified by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS analyses and served as membrane proteome which played an important role in squamous lung cancer. 2018-09-10T03:38:45Z 2018-09-10T03:38:45Z 2008-09-01 Journal 01252526 2-s2.0-67650702121 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650702121&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60152 |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
topic |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Chemistry Materials Science Mathematics Physics and Astronomy |
spellingShingle |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Chemistry Materials Science Mathematics Physics and Astronomy Piyorot Hongsachart Supachok Sinchaikul Suree Phutrakul Weerah Wongkham Shui Tein Chen Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line |
description |
Although several methods for extracting and handling membrane proteins for proteomics experiments have been reported, the direct comparison of different methods has never been clarified for the identifying membrane proteome in lung cancer cell lines. This study was purposed to find a protocol suitable for membrane protein extraction and to identify the membrane proteome in lung cancer. Three detergent-based extraction methods including sequential detergent extraction using Triton X-100 and digitonin, Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation were used to enrich the membrane proteins from SW900 squamous lung cancer cell line. The membrane protein profiles separated by SDS-PAGE and two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) were compared. Mem-PER Eukaryotic membrane protein extraction kit was our preferable method which showed the highest number of protein spots, compared to the other methods, and the good resolution of membrane protein separation on the prote n profile. The three membrane protein profiles from three extraction methods showed 73 matched protein spots, in which 15 membrane proteins were successfully identified by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS analyses and served as membrane proteome which played an important role in squamous lung cancer. |
format |
Journal |
author |
Piyorot Hongsachart Supachok Sinchaikul Suree Phutrakul Weerah Wongkham Shui Tein Chen |
author_facet |
Piyorot Hongsachart Supachok Sinchaikul Suree Phutrakul Weerah Wongkham Shui Tein Chen |
author_sort |
Piyorot Hongsachart |
title |
Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line |
title_short |
Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line |
title_full |
Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line |
title_fullStr |
Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of SW900 squamous lung Cancer cell line |
title_sort |
comparative embrane extraction methods for identifying membrane proteome of sw900 squamous lung cancer cell line |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650702121&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60152 |
_version_ |
1681425383090552832 |