Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals

Several CD4 lymphocyte enumeration methods have been developed to be used as alternatives to conventional flow cytometry. However, no consensus has been reached on which technique should be widely adopted. We introduce here a novel nonflow cytometric method, called CD4 Select, for enumeration of CD4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai, Kittipong Rungruengthanakit, Phonethipsavanh Nouanthong, Supansa Pata, Thira Sirisanthana, Watchara Kasinrerk
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=38649124930&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60671
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-60671
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-606712018-09-10T03:46:58Z Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai Kittipong Rungruengthanakit Phonethipsavanh Nouanthong Supansa Pata Thira Sirisanthana Watchara Kasinrerk Medicine Several CD4 lymphocyte enumeration methods have been developed to be used as alternatives to conventional flow cytometry. However, no consensus has been reached on which technique should be widely adopted. We introduce here a novel nonflow cytometric method, called CD4 Select, for enumeration of CD4 lymphocytes. Instead of using a flow cytometer, the method requires only an automatic hematoanalyzer (complete blood count [CBC] machine). The correlations of the percentage of CD4 lymphocytes and absolute CD4 counts with the CD4 Select method and standard flow cytometry were 0.932 and 0.922, respectively. The CD4 Select method yielded percentage of CD4 lymphocytes greater than flow cytometry by a mean of 0.06%, and the limits of agreement at 95% confidence interval (CI) were 9.46% to -9.56% using Bland-Altman analysis. The CD4 select method is cheap, valid, and simple enough to be conducted locally at small facilities. The method yields not only absolute CD4 lymphocytes, but also percentage of CD4 lymphocytes. The use of a hematoanalyzer also gives this method relatively high sample throughput and makes it less labor-intensive than other nonflow cytometric methods. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2018-09-10T03:46:58Z 2018-09-10T03:46:58Z 2008-02-01 Journal 15254135 2-s2.0-38649124930 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181624ab5 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=38649124930&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60671
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
Kittipong Rungruengthanakit
Phonethipsavanh Nouanthong
Supansa Pata
Thira Sirisanthana
Watchara Kasinrerk
Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
description Several CD4 lymphocyte enumeration methods have been developed to be used as alternatives to conventional flow cytometry. However, no consensus has been reached on which technique should be widely adopted. We introduce here a novel nonflow cytometric method, called CD4 Select, for enumeration of CD4 lymphocytes. Instead of using a flow cytometer, the method requires only an automatic hematoanalyzer (complete blood count [CBC] machine). The correlations of the percentage of CD4 lymphocytes and absolute CD4 counts with the CD4 Select method and standard flow cytometry were 0.932 and 0.922, respectively. The CD4 Select method yielded percentage of CD4 lymphocytes greater than flow cytometry by a mean of 0.06%, and the limits of agreement at 95% confidence interval (CI) were 9.46% to -9.56% using Bland-Altman analysis. The CD4 select method is cheap, valid, and simple enough to be conducted locally at small facilities. The method yields not only absolute CD4 lymphocytes, but also percentage of CD4 lymphocytes. The use of a hematoanalyzer also gives this method relatively high sample throughput and makes it less labor-intensive than other nonflow cytometric methods. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
format Journal
author Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
Kittipong Rungruengthanakit
Phonethipsavanh Nouanthong
Supansa Pata
Thira Sirisanthana
Watchara Kasinrerk
author_facet Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
Kittipong Rungruengthanakit
Phonethipsavanh Nouanthong
Supansa Pata
Thira Sirisanthana
Watchara Kasinrerk
author_sort Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
title Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_short Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_full Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_fullStr Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_full_unstemmed Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_sort novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of cd4 counts in hiv-infected individuals
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=38649124930&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60671
_version_ 1681425478970245120