Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia

Action research has been part of the methodological spectrum of the social sciences for a long time. After an initial boom period in the 1970s and 1980s, however, the discussion has now abated somewhat. At present, action research is promoted mainly in two applied fields: In the context of organizat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Neef, Rupert Friederichsen, Dieter Neubert
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=69849130487&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60747
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-60747
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-607472018-09-10T03:49:09Z Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia Andreas Neef Rupert Friederichsen Dieter Neubert Social Sciences Action research has been part of the methodological spectrum of the social sciences for a long time. After an initial boom period in the 1970s and 1980s, however, the discussion has now abated somewhat. At present, action research is promoted mainly in two applied fields: In the context of organizational research and in development-oriented agricultural research, commonly under the label 'participatory research'. In this paper, we analyze the potential of action research by individuals within their own organization, drawing on a collaborative research program. The objective of this program is to enhance action research approaches in agricultural research and explore their potential, while at the same time critically examining their limitations. Thereby, researchers and the institutional innovation process become the central focus of the research. The project thus operates at the interface between organizational research, organizational anthropology, sociology of knowledge, and agricultural research. Our experience suggests that insider action research in a research organization penetrates the research routine in particular ways, brings the backstage of the research praxis into the limelight and integrates it into the methodical debate. The positionality of the action researcher, related power asymmetries, and the exposed actors' defense mechanisms that emerge from this setting pose particular challenges for insider action researcher. © 2011 Duncker & Humblot GmbH. 2018-09-10T03:49:09Z 2018-09-10T03:49:09Z 2008-12-01 Journal 18655106 00380377 2-s2.0-69849130487 10.3790/soc.58.1.73 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=69849130487&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60747
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Social Sciences
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Andreas Neef
Rupert Friederichsen
Dieter Neubert
Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia
description Action research has been part of the methodological spectrum of the social sciences for a long time. After an initial boom period in the 1970s and 1980s, however, the discussion has now abated somewhat. At present, action research is promoted mainly in two applied fields: In the context of organizational research and in development-oriented agricultural research, commonly under the label 'participatory research'. In this paper, we analyze the potential of action research by individuals within their own organization, drawing on a collaborative research program. The objective of this program is to enhance action research approaches in agricultural research and explore their potential, while at the same time critically examining their limitations. Thereby, researchers and the institutional innovation process become the central focus of the research. The project thus operates at the interface between organizational research, organizational anthropology, sociology of knowledge, and agricultural research. Our experience suggests that insider action research in a research organization penetrates the research routine in particular ways, brings the backstage of the research praxis into the limelight and integrates it into the methodical debate. The positionality of the action researcher, related power asymmetries, and the exposed actors' defense mechanisms that emerge from this setting pose particular challenges for insider action researcher. © 2011 Duncker & Humblot GmbH.
format Journal
author Andreas Neef
Rupert Friederichsen
Dieter Neubert
author_facet Andreas Neef
Rupert Friederichsen
Dieter Neubert
author_sort Andreas Neef
title Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia
title_short Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia
title_full Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia
title_fullStr Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia
title_full_unstemmed Juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? Insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in Southeast Asia
title_sort juggling multiple roles or falling between all stools? insider action research in a collaborative agricultural research program in southeast asia
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=69849130487&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60747
_version_ 1681425493040037888