Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins

Objective: To determine if anatomical variations in the paranasal sinuses of twins are the result of genetic or environmental influences. Study design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Participants: Twenty-five volunteer twins (17 identical twin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Chaiyasate, I. Baron, P. Clement
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34147096404&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61319
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-61319
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-613192018-09-10T04:08:32Z Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins S. Chaiyasate I. Baron P. Clement Medicine Objective: To determine if anatomical variations in the paranasal sinuses of twins are the result of genetic or environmental influences. Study design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Participants: Twenty-five volunteer twins (17 identical twins and eight non-identical twins). Of the identical twins, six were both female and 11 both male. The mean age was 40.6 years (18-49). Of the non-identical twins, one pair was female and seven were male. The mean age was 39.6 years (25-48). Main outcome measures: The CT-scan similarity in anatomical structures (frontal cells, agger nasi cells, concha bullosa, infraorbital cells and changes in the shape of the lamina orbitalis), and the intranasal and paranasal sinus morphology was compared between the twins. Results: Among the studied variables, there was no statistically significant difference between the two twin groups (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). Regarding combine-studied parameters, there were no identical CT scans in the twins. However, a tendency of non-genetic influence existed in the development of frontal cell type III and IV, and infraorbital cells, as well as a liability of genetic influence in the presence of concha bullosa. Conclusion: In this study, the differences in anatomical structure of the paranasal sinuses between identical and non-identical twin pairs were not statistically significant. This indicates that environmental factors are more significant than genetic ones in the development of anatomical variations in paranasal sinus anatomy. © 2007 The Authors. 2018-09-10T04:08:32Z 2018-09-10T04:08:32Z 2007-04-01 Journal 17494486 17494478 2-s2.0-34147096404 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01404.x https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34147096404&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61319
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
S. Chaiyasate
I. Baron
P. Clement
Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
description Objective: To determine if anatomical variations in the paranasal sinuses of twins are the result of genetic or environmental influences. Study design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Participants: Twenty-five volunteer twins (17 identical twins and eight non-identical twins). Of the identical twins, six were both female and 11 both male. The mean age was 40.6 years (18-49). Of the non-identical twins, one pair was female and seven were male. The mean age was 39.6 years (25-48). Main outcome measures: The CT-scan similarity in anatomical structures (frontal cells, agger nasi cells, concha bullosa, infraorbital cells and changes in the shape of the lamina orbitalis), and the intranasal and paranasal sinus morphology was compared between the twins. Results: Among the studied variables, there was no statistically significant difference between the two twin groups (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). Regarding combine-studied parameters, there were no identical CT scans in the twins. However, a tendency of non-genetic influence existed in the development of frontal cell type III and IV, and infraorbital cells, as well as a liability of genetic influence in the presence of concha bullosa. Conclusion: In this study, the differences in anatomical structure of the paranasal sinuses between identical and non-identical twin pairs were not statistically significant. This indicates that environmental factors are more significant than genetic ones in the development of anatomical variations in paranasal sinus anatomy. © 2007 The Authors.
format Journal
author S. Chaiyasate
I. Baron
P. Clement
author_facet S. Chaiyasate
I. Baron
P. Clement
author_sort S. Chaiyasate
title Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_short Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_full Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_fullStr Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_sort analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: a ct genetic study in twins
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34147096404&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61319
_version_ 1681425598592843776