The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears

Objective: To compare the cytomorphologic quality of the cervical (Pap) smears between two fixation techniques, rehydration of air-dried smears (AD) versus wet fixation (WF). Material and Method: Paired-cervical smears (AD and WF) from 172 women who underwent cervical cytology screening at Chiang Ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krit Jaiwong, Kanchana Nimmanhaeminda, Sitthicha Siriaree, Surapan Khunamornpong
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845492623&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61802
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-61802
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-618022018-09-11T08:59:25Z The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears Krit Jaiwong Kanchana Nimmanhaeminda Sitthicha Siriaree Surapan Khunamornpong Medicine Objective: To compare the cytomorphologic quality of the cervical (Pap) smears between two fixation techniques, rehydration of air-dried smears (AD) versus wet fixation (WF). Material and Method: Paired-cervical smears (AD and WF) from 172 women who underwent cervical cytology screening at Chiang Mai University Hospital between August 2004 and September 2004 were prospectively evaluated for the cytologic parameters and the staining qualities. Results: The mean age of the 172 women was 41.7 years (± 2 SD 18.1), 27 women (15.7%) were postmenopausal. Absence of red blood cells in the smear background was significantly more frequent in AD smears than in WF specimens (p = 0.0006). Air-drying artifact was more frequent in AD smears compared to those of WF (p = 0.036) but was of only mild degree in all cases. There was no significant difference between AD and WF smears in the cytoplasmic quality including distinctness of cell border (p = 0.30) and satisfactory staining (p = 0.054). For the nuclear morphology, there was no significant difference between both fixation techniques in the distinctness of nuclear border (p = 0.26) and chromatin crispness (p = 0.23) of the endocervical nuclei. In squamous nuclei, AD smears had higher frequency of indistinct nuclear border and hazy chromatin compared to WF smears (p = 0.003 each). However, these were observed in only mild degree and did not affect the cytologic interpretation. Conclusion: The quality of AD smears was slightly inferior to WF smears but was still satisfactory for cervical cytology. AD technique may be acceptable as an alternative to wet fixation in cytologic cervical cancer screening. 2018-09-11T08:59:25Z 2018-09-11T08:59:25Z 2006-11-01 Journal 01252208 01252208 2-s2.0-33845492623 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845492623&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61802
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Krit Jaiwong
Kanchana Nimmanhaeminda
Sitthicha Siriaree
Surapan Khunamornpong
The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
description Objective: To compare the cytomorphologic quality of the cervical (Pap) smears between two fixation techniques, rehydration of air-dried smears (AD) versus wet fixation (WF). Material and Method: Paired-cervical smears (AD and WF) from 172 women who underwent cervical cytology screening at Chiang Mai University Hospital between August 2004 and September 2004 were prospectively evaluated for the cytologic parameters and the staining qualities. Results: The mean age of the 172 women was 41.7 years (± 2 SD 18.1), 27 women (15.7%) were postmenopausal. Absence of red blood cells in the smear background was significantly more frequent in AD smears than in WF specimens (p = 0.0006). Air-drying artifact was more frequent in AD smears compared to those of WF (p = 0.036) but was of only mild degree in all cases. There was no significant difference between AD and WF smears in the cytoplasmic quality including distinctness of cell border (p = 0.30) and satisfactory staining (p = 0.054). For the nuclear morphology, there was no significant difference between both fixation techniques in the distinctness of nuclear border (p = 0.26) and chromatin crispness (p = 0.23) of the endocervical nuclei. In squamous nuclei, AD smears had higher frequency of indistinct nuclear border and hazy chromatin compared to WF smears (p = 0.003 each). However, these were observed in only mild degree and did not affect the cytologic interpretation. Conclusion: The quality of AD smears was slightly inferior to WF smears but was still satisfactory for cervical cytology. AD technique may be acceptable as an alternative to wet fixation in cytologic cervical cancer screening.
format Journal
author Krit Jaiwong
Kanchana Nimmanhaeminda
Sitthicha Siriaree
Surapan Khunamornpong
author_facet Krit Jaiwong
Kanchana Nimmanhaeminda
Sitthicha Siriaree
Surapan Khunamornpong
author_sort Krit Jaiwong
title The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
title_short The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
title_full The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
title_fullStr The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
title_full_unstemmed The cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
title_sort cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smears
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845492623&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61802
_version_ 1681425688718999552