Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section

Objective: To describe the experience of misoprostol use for pregnancy interruption in the second trimester of women with previous cesarean section Material and Method: Seventeen pregnant women with viable fetuses and with previous cesarean section indicated for second trimester pregnancy interrupti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saipin Pongsatha, Theera Tongsong
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33748494459&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61823
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-61823
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-618232018-09-11T08:59:45Z Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section Saipin Pongsatha Theera Tongsong Medicine Objective: To describe the experience of misoprostol use for pregnancy interruption in the second trimester of women with previous cesarean section Material and Method: Seventeen pregnant women with viable fetuses and with previous cesarean section indicated for second trimester pregnancy interruption attending Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital were recruited. All received the same regimen of 400 mcg intravaginal misoprostol every 6 hours. The data was analyzed for demographic characteristics, the adverse outcomes, success rate, and time interval to fetal expulsion. Results: The incidences of adverse outcomes were as follows, fever (47.1%), chill (23.5%), and nausea (17.6%). No uterine rupture occurred in this series at all. The rate of oxytocin use and analgesia requirement was 29.4%. Success rate of pregnancy interruption was 100%, though two of them had an abortion time of more than 48 hours. Time interval from misoprostol administration to fetal expulsion was 25.9 ± 34.1 hours (range 4.0-142.7 hours). Conclusion: This case series reaffirms the efficacy of misoprostol and suggests that misoprostol may relatively be safe even in cases with previous cesarean section. Therefore, misoprostol may be an option of pregnancy interruption in the second trimester to avoid unnecessary surgical procedure including hysterotomy. However, the safety should be tested by further studies with a larger sample size. 2018-09-11T08:59:45Z 2018-09-11T08:59:45Z 2006-09-15 Journal 01252208 01252208 2-s2.0-33748494459 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33748494459&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61823
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Saipin Pongsatha
Theera Tongsong
Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
description Objective: To describe the experience of misoprostol use for pregnancy interruption in the second trimester of women with previous cesarean section Material and Method: Seventeen pregnant women with viable fetuses and with previous cesarean section indicated for second trimester pregnancy interruption attending Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital were recruited. All received the same regimen of 400 mcg intravaginal misoprostol every 6 hours. The data was analyzed for demographic characteristics, the adverse outcomes, success rate, and time interval to fetal expulsion. Results: The incidences of adverse outcomes were as follows, fever (47.1%), chill (23.5%), and nausea (17.6%). No uterine rupture occurred in this series at all. The rate of oxytocin use and analgesia requirement was 29.4%. Success rate of pregnancy interruption was 100%, though two of them had an abortion time of more than 48 hours. Time interval from misoprostol administration to fetal expulsion was 25.9 ± 34.1 hours (range 4.0-142.7 hours). Conclusion: This case series reaffirms the efficacy of misoprostol and suggests that misoprostol may relatively be safe even in cases with previous cesarean section. Therefore, misoprostol may be an option of pregnancy interruption in the second trimester to avoid unnecessary surgical procedure including hysterotomy. However, the safety should be tested by further studies with a larger sample size.
format Journal
author Saipin Pongsatha
Theera Tongsong
author_facet Saipin Pongsatha
Theera Tongsong
author_sort Saipin Pongsatha
title Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
title_short Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
title_full Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
title_fullStr Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
title_sort second-trimester pregnancy interruption with vaginal misoprostol in women with previous cesarean section
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33748494459&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61823
_version_ 1681425692607119360