Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents

Background: Ureteral stents are in common use in urologic practice. Even though the stent is a valuable urological tool, its use has two widely encountered complications, namely, stent encrustation and stone formation. These complications are difficult to manage; but endourologic surgery, which is m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bannakij Lojanapiwat
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=31544453902&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62348
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-62348
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-623482018-09-11T09:26:02Z Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents Bannakij Lojanapiwat Medicine Background: Ureteral stents are in common use in urologic practice. Even though the stent is a valuable urological tool, its use has two widely encountered complications, namely, stent encrustation and stone formation. These complications are difficult to manage; but endourologic surgery, which is minimally invasive, has become the first choice in the treatment for encrustation and stone formation. Material and Method: Eight patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents were treated by endourologic techniques. One patient had severe encrustation at all sites of the stent and was treated by percutaneuos nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and cystolitholapaxy. Five patients with severe encrustation at both ends of the stent were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy(4 cases) and with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and cystolitholapaxy. The last two patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents at the bladder end were treated with percutaneous cystolithotomy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and by optical lithotrite, respectively. Results: All cases were stone free and stent free in one session without complication. The average approaches were 1.9 (range 1-3). All stents were removed intact and no subsequent stent was required following the removal of the problematic stent. Conclusion: Endourologic surgery which is minimally invasive surgery, is the first choice of treatment for the management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with good results in one session without complications and no subsequent stent is necessary. The authors recommend removing the stent as soon as possible or change the new stent every 3 months for decreasing the incidence of these complications. 2018-09-11T09:26:02Z 2018-09-11T09:26:02Z 2005-09-01 Journal 01252208 01252208 2-s2.0-31544453902 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=31544453902&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62348
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Bannakij Lojanapiwat
Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
description Background: Ureteral stents are in common use in urologic practice. Even though the stent is a valuable urological tool, its use has two widely encountered complications, namely, stent encrustation and stone formation. These complications are difficult to manage; but endourologic surgery, which is minimally invasive, has become the first choice in the treatment for encrustation and stone formation. Material and Method: Eight patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents were treated by endourologic techniques. One patient had severe encrustation at all sites of the stent and was treated by percutaneuos nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and cystolitholapaxy. Five patients with severe encrustation at both ends of the stent were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy(4 cases) and with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and cystolitholapaxy. The last two patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents at the bladder end were treated with percutaneous cystolithotomy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and by optical lithotrite, respectively. Results: All cases were stone free and stent free in one session without complication. The average approaches were 1.9 (range 1-3). All stents were removed intact and no subsequent stent was required following the removal of the problematic stent. Conclusion: Endourologic surgery which is minimally invasive surgery, is the first choice of treatment for the management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with good results in one session without complications and no subsequent stent is necessary. The authors recommend removing the stent as soon as possible or change the new stent every 3 months for decreasing the incidence of these complications.
format Journal
author Bannakij Lojanapiwat
author_facet Bannakij Lojanapiwat
author_sort Bannakij Lojanapiwat
title Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_short Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_full Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_fullStr Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_full_unstemmed Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_sort endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=31544453902&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62348
_version_ 1681425790089035776