Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations

© 2018 Japan Health Sciences University & Japan International Cultural Exchange Foundation. Objective: The supracondylar process is a bony beak like spur in the supracondylar region of the humerus. It is a congenital deformity. It may be present with or without symptoms. The main objective of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srijit Das, Apichat Sinthubua, Sittiporn Ruengdit, Phruksachat Singsuwan, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056585594&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-62780
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-627802018-11-29T07:49:56Z Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations Srijit Das Apichat Sinthubua Sittiporn Ruengdit Phruksachat Singsuwan Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh Medicine © 2018 Japan Health Sciences University & Japan International Cultural Exchange Foundation. Objective: The supracondylar process is a bony beak like spur in the supracondylar region of the humerus. It is a congenital deformity. It may be present with or without symptoms. The main objective of the present study was to observe any bony beak like spur in the supracondylar process in the humerus of cadavers. Design: A study on the humerus to observe the presence of any supracondylar process in the humerus. Materials and Methods: Three hundred humerus (n = 300) presented in the osteological repository of Forensic Osteology Research Centre, Chiang Mai University were taken for the study. The supracondylar region of each humerus was studied in detail for any abnormal spurs, if present. The specimen was photographed and morphometric measurements were taken. Results: Out of 300 bone specimens, only one single specimen exhibited the presence of supracondylar process i.e. spur (0.003%). The spur was observed on the condylar region of left humerus bone. The length of the spur was 2.44 cm. The spur was located at a distance of 17.82 cm from the upper end and 11.12 cm from the lower end of the humerus, respectively. No other abnormalities were observed. Conclusion: Presence of spur in any bone may mislead radiologists interpreting radiographs. Spurs may also impinge on surrounding soft tissue structures and cause unnecessary pain or even remain undetected without any symptom. 2018-11-29T07:49:56Z 2018-11-29T07:49:56Z 2018-12-01 Journal 13412051 2-s2.0-85056585594 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056585594&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62780
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Srijit Das
Apichat Sinthubua
Sittiporn Ruengdit
Phruksachat Singsuwan
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations
description © 2018 Japan Health Sciences University & Japan International Cultural Exchange Foundation. Objective: The supracondylar process is a bony beak like spur in the supracondylar region of the humerus. It is a congenital deformity. It may be present with or without symptoms. The main objective of the present study was to observe any bony beak like spur in the supracondylar process in the humerus of cadavers. Design: A study on the humerus to observe the presence of any supracondylar process in the humerus. Materials and Methods: Three hundred humerus (n = 300) presented in the osteological repository of Forensic Osteology Research Centre, Chiang Mai University were taken for the study. The supracondylar region of each humerus was studied in detail for any abnormal spurs, if present. The specimen was photographed and morphometric measurements were taken. Results: Out of 300 bone specimens, only one single specimen exhibited the presence of supracondylar process i.e. spur (0.003%). The spur was observed on the condylar region of left humerus bone. The length of the spur was 2.44 cm. The spur was located at a distance of 17.82 cm from the upper end and 11.12 cm from the lower end of the humerus, respectively. No other abnormalities were observed. Conclusion: Presence of spur in any bone may mislead radiologists interpreting radiographs. Spurs may also impinge on surrounding soft tissue structures and cause unnecessary pain or even remain undetected without any symptom.
format Journal
author Srijit Das
Apichat Sinthubua
Sittiporn Ruengdit
Phruksachat Singsuwan
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
author_facet Srijit Das
Apichat Sinthubua
Sittiporn Ruengdit
Phruksachat Singsuwan
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
author_sort Srijit Das
title Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations
title_short Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations
title_full Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations
title_fullStr Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations
title_full_unstemmed Supracondylar process of the humerus: Anatomical and clinical considerations
title_sort supracondylar process of the humerus: anatomical and clinical considerations
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056585594&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62780
_version_ 1681425870829387776