Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review

© 2018 Warmia and Mazury Medical Chamber. All rights reserved. Introduction: Diaphragm Mobility (DM) assessment is gaining interest in the field of medicine and in the healthcare sector. Despite its clinical usage, the measure of reliability in assessing DM is not clearly known. Aim: To critically a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vikram Mohan, Aatit Paungmali, Patraporn Sitilerpisan, Sulaiman Md Dom, Ummi Farhana Hashim, Siti Nor Binti Daud, Manikumar Muthiah
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056773620&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62840
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-62840
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-628402018-11-29T07:54:19Z Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review Vikram Mohan Aatit Paungmali Patraporn Sitilerpisan Sulaiman Md Dom Ummi Farhana Hashim Siti Nor Binti Daud Manikumar Muthiah Medicine © 2018 Warmia and Mazury Medical Chamber. All rights reserved. Introduction: Diaphragm Mobility (DM) assessment is gaining interest in the field of medicine and in the healthcare sector. Despite its clinical usage, the measure of reliability in assessing DM is not clearly known. Aim: To critically appraise the evidence describing the reliability measures of DM assessment using any of the diagnostic modalities. Material and methods: A systematic search across five databases was carried out from January 1990 to September 2016. Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QUAREL) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were used to assess the risk of bias and for rating the quality of the evidence. In addition, levels of evidence grading which synthesize all the included articles for grading were also used. Results and discussion: Four papers were included for assessing both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability using ultrasound and radiography. Three papers reported ICC measures of reliability, with one paper reporting CV% of reliability. The results demonstrate that, overall, lower levels of evidence exist among the selected articles between moderate and good for intra-rater reliability and good for inter-rater reliability measures. The synthesis of all the included articles demonstrated that, overall, moderate evidence exists. Conclusions: There were moderate-to-good reliability measures with a low risk of bias in both the forms of reliability for assessing diaphragmatic mobility. 2018-11-29T07:54:19Z 2018-11-29T07:54:19Z 2018-01-01 Journal 12308013 2-s2.0-85056773620 10.29089/2017.17.00044 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056773620&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62840
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Vikram Mohan
Aatit Paungmali
Patraporn Sitilerpisan
Sulaiman Md Dom
Ummi Farhana Hashim
Siti Nor Binti Daud
Manikumar Muthiah
Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review
description © 2018 Warmia and Mazury Medical Chamber. All rights reserved. Introduction: Diaphragm Mobility (DM) assessment is gaining interest in the field of medicine and in the healthcare sector. Despite its clinical usage, the measure of reliability in assessing DM is not clearly known. Aim: To critically appraise the evidence describing the reliability measures of DM assessment using any of the diagnostic modalities. Material and methods: A systematic search across five databases was carried out from January 1990 to September 2016. Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QUAREL) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were used to assess the risk of bias and for rating the quality of the evidence. In addition, levels of evidence grading which synthesize all the included articles for grading were also used. Results and discussion: Four papers were included for assessing both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability using ultrasound and radiography. Three papers reported ICC measures of reliability, with one paper reporting CV% of reliability. The results demonstrate that, overall, lower levels of evidence exist among the selected articles between moderate and good for intra-rater reliability and good for inter-rater reliability measures. The synthesis of all the included articles demonstrated that, overall, moderate evidence exists. Conclusions: There were moderate-to-good reliability measures with a low risk of bias in both the forms of reliability for assessing diaphragmatic mobility.
format Journal
author Vikram Mohan
Aatit Paungmali
Patraporn Sitilerpisan
Sulaiman Md Dom
Ummi Farhana Hashim
Siti Nor Binti Daud
Manikumar Muthiah
author_facet Vikram Mohan
Aatit Paungmali
Patraporn Sitilerpisan
Sulaiman Md Dom
Ummi Farhana Hashim
Siti Nor Binti Daud
Manikumar Muthiah
author_sort Vikram Mohan
title Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review
title_short Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review
title_full Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review
title_fullStr Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: A systematic review
title_sort reliability of diaphragmatic mobility assessment: a systematic review
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056773620&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62840
_version_ 1681425881968410624