Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience

© 2018 Elsevier Inc. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial neoplasms with prominent neuroendocrine differentiation. Cytologic examination and utilization of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are important diagnostic tools for the evaluation of these tumors. Herein we report our experience with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erika F. Rodriguez, J. Judd Fite, Sayanan Chowsilpa, Zahra Maleki
Format: Journal
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061738084&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-63696
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-636962019-03-18T02:24:14Z Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience Erika F. Rodriguez J. Judd Fite Sayanan Chowsilpa Zahra Maleki Medicine © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial neoplasms with prominent neuroendocrine differentiation. Cytologic examination and utilization of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are important diagnostic tools for the evaluation of these tumors. Herein we report our experience with the application of INSM1 in cytology samples. We searched our pathology system for cytologic specimens with INSM1 IHC performed from 2017 to 2018. Patients' demographics were recorded, and cytology materials were reviewed including all neuroendocrine IHC markers performed. A total of 134 (67 male, 67 female) specimens with INSM1 IHC were identified. Specimens included 91 (68.2%) NETs or tumors with neuroendocrine features (TNEFs), 33 (24.3%) nonneuroendocrine lesions (non-NET), and 10 (7.5%) nonneoplastic diagnoses. INSM1 was positive in 90 (99%) of the NET/TNEFs and negative in 32 (97%) non-NETs. CD56 was positive in 42 (95.5%) of the NET/TNEFs and negative on 9 (69.2%) of the non-NETs. The sensitivity of INSM1 was 99% and specificity was 97%, whereas the sensitivity of CD56 was 95.5% and specificity was 69.2%. Chromogranin had the lowest sensitivity (82.5%), and synaptophysin had the lowest specificity (66.7%). Both positive and negative predictive values of INSM1 were higher than CD56 (99% versus 91.3% and 97% versus 81.8%, respectively). INSM1 is a sensitive and specific marker for detection of NETs in cytology samples independent of primary site. 2019-03-18T02:24:14Z 2019-03-18T02:24:14Z 2019-03-01 Journal 15328392 00468177 2-s2.0-85061738084 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.10.035 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061738084&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63696
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Erika F. Rodriguez
J. Judd Fite
Sayanan Chowsilpa
Zahra Maleki
Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
description © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial neoplasms with prominent neuroendocrine differentiation. Cytologic examination and utilization of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are important diagnostic tools for the evaluation of these tumors. Herein we report our experience with the application of INSM1 in cytology samples. We searched our pathology system for cytologic specimens with INSM1 IHC performed from 2017 to 2018. Patients' demographics were recorded, and cytology materials were reviewed including all neuroendocrine IHC markers performed. A total of 134 (67 male, 67 female) specimens with INSM1 IHC were identified. Specimens included 91 (68.2%) NETs or tumors with neuroendocrine features (TNEFs), 33 (24.3%) nonneuroendocrine lesions (non-NET), and 10 (7.5%) nonneoplastic diagnoses. INSM1 was positive in 90 (99%) of the NET/TNEFs and negative in 32 (97%) non-NETs. CD56 was positive in 42 (95.5%) of the NET/TNEFs and negative on 9 (69.2%) of the non-NETs. The sensitivity of INSM1 was 99% and specificity was 97%, whereas the sensitivity of CD56 was 95.5% and specificity was 69.2%. Chromogranin had the lowest sensitivity (82.5%), and synaptophysin had the lowest specificity (66.7%). Both positive and negative predictive values of INSM1 were higher than CD56 (99% versus 91.3% and 97% versus 81.8%, respectively). INSM1 is a sensitive and specific marker for detection of NETs in cytology samples independent of primary site.
format Journal
author Erika F. Rodriguez
J. Judd Fite
Sayanan Chowsilpa
Zahra Maleki
author_facet Erika F. Rodriguez
J. Judd Fite
Sayanan Chowsilpa
Zahra Maleki
author_sort Erika F. Rodriguez
title Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
title_short Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
title_full Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
title_fullStr Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
title_full_unstemmed Insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
title_sort insulinoma-associated protein 1 immunostaining on cytology specimens: an institutional experience
publishDate 2019
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061738084&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63696
_version_ 1681425943410769920