DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study

PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy and safety of repeated dexamethasone (DEX) implants over 24 months, in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes that were treatment naive compared with eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, in a real-life environment. METHODS: This multicente...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matias Iglicki, Catharina Busch, Dinah Zur, Mali Okada, Miriana Mariussi, Jay Kumar Chhablani, Zafer Cebeci, Samantha Fraser-Bell, Voraporn Chaikitmongkol, Aude Couturier, Ermete Giancipoli, Marco Lupidi, Patricio J. Rodríguez-Valdés, Matus Rehak, Adrian Tien Chin Fung, Michaella Goldstein, Anat Loewenstein
Format: Journal
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050858198&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63742
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-63742
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-637422019-03-18T02:25:10Z DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study Matias Iglicki Catharina Busch Dinah Zur Mali Okada Miriana Mariussi Jay Kumar Chhablani Zafer Cebeci Samantha Fraser-Bell Voraporn Chaikitmongkol Aude Couturier Ermete Giancipoli Marco Lupidi Patricio J. Rodríguez-Valdés Matus Rehak Adrian Tien Chin Fung Michaella Goldstein Anat Loewenstein Medicine PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy and safety of repeated dexamethasone (DEX) implants over 24 months, in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes that were treatment naive compared with eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, in a real-life environment. METHODS: This multicenter international retrospective study assessed best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) of naive and refractory eyes to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections treated with dexamethasone implants. Safety data (intraocular pressure rise and cataract surgery) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 130 eyes from 125 patients were included. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity and CST were similar for naive (n = 71) and refractory eyes (n = 59). Both groups improved significantly in vision after 24 months (P < 0.001). However, naive eyes gained statistically significantly more vision than refractory eyes (+11.3 ± 10.0 vs. 7.3 ± 2.7 letters, P = 0.01) and were more likely to gain ≥10 letters (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19-9.24, P = 0.02). At 6, 12, and 24 months, CST was significantly decreased compared with baseline in both naive and refractory eyes; however, CST was higher in refractory eyes than in naive eyes (CST 279 ± 61 vs. 313 ± 125 μm, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Over a follow-up of 24 months, vision improved in diabetic macular edema eyes after treatment with dexamethasone implants, both in eyes that were treatment naive and eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment; however, improvement was greater in naive eyes. 2019-03-18T02:25:10Z 2019-03-18T02:25:10Z 2019-01-01 Journal 15392864 2-s2.0-85050858198 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002196 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050858198&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63742
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Matias Iglicki
Catharina Busch
Dinah Zur
Mali Okada
Miriana Mariussi
Jay Kumar Chhablani
Zafer Cebeci
Samantha Fraser-Bell
Voraporn Chaikitmongkol
Aude Couturier
Ermete Giancipoli
Marco Lupidi
Patricio J. Rodríguez-Valdés
Matus Rehak
Adrian Tien Chin Fung
Michaella Goldstein
Anat Loewenstein
DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study
description PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy and safety of repeated dexamethasone (DEX) implants over 24 months, in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes that were treatment naive compared with eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, in a real-life environment. METHODS: This multicenter international retrospective study assessed best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) of naive and refractory eyes to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections treated with dexamethasone implants. Safety data (intraocular pressure rise and cataract surgery) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 130 eyes from 125 patients were included. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity and CST were similar for naive (n = 71) and refractory eyes (n = 59). Both groups improved significantly in vision after 24 months (P < 0.001). However, naive eyes gained statistically significantly more vision than refractory eyes (+11.3 ± 10.0 vs. 7.3 ± 2.7 letters, P = 0.01) and were more likely to gain ≥10 letters (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19-9.24, P = 0.02). At 6, 12, and 24 months, CST was significantly decreased compared with baseline in both naive and refractory eyes; however, CST was higher in refractory eyes than in naive eyes (CST 279 ± 61 vs. 313 ± 125 μm, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Over a follow-up of 24 months, vision improved in diabetic macular edema eyes after treatment with dexamethasone implants, both in eyes that were treatment naive and eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment; however, improvement was greater in naive eyes.
format Journal
author Matias Iglicki
Catharina Busch
Dinah Zur
Mali Okada
Miriana Mariussi
Jay Kumar Chhablani
Zafer Cebeci
Samantha Fraser-Bell
Voraporn Chaikitmongkol
Aude Couturier
Ermete Giancipoli
Marco Lupidi
Patricio J. Rodríguez-Valdés
Matus Rehak
Adrian Tien Chin Fung
Michaella Goldstein
Anat Loewenstein
author_facet Matias Iglicki
Catharina Busch
Dinah Zur
Mali Okada
Miriana Mariussi
Jay Kumar Chhablani
Zafer Cebeci
Samantha Fraser-Bell
Voraporn Chaikitmongkol
Aude Couturier
Ermete Giancipoli
Marco Lupidi
Patricio J. Rodríguez-Valdés
Matus Rehak
Adrian Tien Chin Fung
Michaella Goldstein
Anat Loewenstein
author_sort Matias Iglicki
title DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study
title_short DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study
title_full DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study
title_fullStr DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study
title_full_unstemmed DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN NAIVE COMPARED WITH REFRACTORY EYES: The International Retina Group Real-Life 24-Month Multicenter Study. The IRGREL-DEX Study
title_sort dexamethasone implant for diabetic macular edema in naive compared with refractory eyes: the international retina group real-life 24-month multicenter study. the irgrel-dex study
publishDate 2019
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050858198&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63742
_version_ 1681425952146456576