Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples

Bloodstream infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is, therefore, essential to differentiate MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) in blood samples as quick as possible. The aim of this study was to eva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Warawan Wongboot, Chariya Chomvarin, Chulapan Engchanila, Wises Namwat, Prajuab Chaimanee
Format: บทความวารสาร
Language:English
Published: Science Faculty of Chiang Mai University 2019
Online Access:http://it.science.cmu.ac.th/ejournal/dl.php?journal_id=7060
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63768
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-63768
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-637682019-05-07T09:57:17Z Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples Warawan Wongboot Chariya Chomvarin Chulapan Engchanila Wises Namwat Prajuab Chaimanee Bloodstream infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is, therefore, essential to differentiate MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) in blood samples as quick as possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the developed conventional PCR and SYBR green real-time PCR assays with the disc diffusion method. For this purpose, 86 blood samples with 76 signal-positive and 10 signal-negative blood samples that were incubated in an automated blood culture system were examined for the presence of S. aureus-specific gene (nuc) and the methicillin resistant gene (mecA) using conventional PCR and SYBR green real-time PCR assays. After 6 h incubation, the spiked-blood samples showed that the sensitivity for detection of MSSA as nuc positive and mecA negative was 1 CFU/ml and that of MRSA as nuc and mecA positive was 10 CFU/ml by both the conventional and SYBR green real-time PCR. The diagnostic accuracy of both PCR-based assays compared between genotypic method (nuc and mecA) and phenotypic method (disc diffusion) was 100% sensitivity, 97.5% specificity, 92.0% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100% negative predictive value (NPV). The results of this study indicated that the developed conventional PCR and SYBR green real-time PCR assays are high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and could be applied as an effective screening tool for the direct detection of MRSA and MSSA in blood samples. 2019-05-07T09:57:17Z 2019-05-07T09:57:17Z 2016 บทความวารสาร 0125-2526 http://it.science.cmu.ac.th/ejournal/dl.php?journal_id=7060 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63768 Eng Science Faculty of Chiang Mai University
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Bloodstream infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is, therefore, essential to differentiate MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) in blood samples as quick as possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the developed conventional PCR and SYBR green real-time PCR assays with the disc diffusion method. For this purpose, 86 blood samples with 76 signal-positive and 10 signal-negative blood samples that were incubated in an automated blood culture system were examined for the presence of S. aureus-specific gene (nuc) and the methicillin resistant gene (mecA) using conventional PCR and SYBR green real-time PCR assays. After 6 h incubation, the spiked-blood samples showed that the sensitivity for detection of MSSA as nuc positive and mecA negative was 1 CFU/ml and that of MRSA as nuc and mecA positive was 10 CFU/ml by both the conventional and SYBR green real-time PCR. The diagnostic accuracy of both PCR-based assays compared between genotypic method (nuc and mecA) and phenotypic method (disc diffusion) was 100% sensitivity, 97.5% specificity, 92.0% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100% negative predictive value (NPV). The results of this study indicated that the developed conventional PCR and SYBR green real-time PCR assays are high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and could be applied as an effective screening tool for the direct detection of MRSA and MSSA in blood samples.
format บทความวารสาร
author Warawan Wongboot
Chariya Chomvarin
Chulapan Engchanila
Wises Namwat
Prajuab Chaimanee
spellingShingle Warawan Wongboot
Chariya Chomvarin
Chulapan Engchanila
Wises Namwat
Prajuab Chaimanee
Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples
author_facet Warawan Wongboot
Chariya Chomvarin
Chulapan Engchanila
Wises Namwat
Prajuab Chaimanee
author_sort Warawan Wongboot
title Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples
title_short Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples
title_full Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples
title_fullStr Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples
title_full_unstemmed Application of SYBR Green Real-Time Quantitative PCR and Conventional PCR for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Samples
title_sort application of sybr green real-time quantitative pcr and conventional pcr for the detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in blood samples
publisher Science Faculty of Chiang Mai University
publishDate 2019
url http://it.science.cmu.ac.th/ejournal/dl.php?journal_id=7060
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63768
_version_ 1681425956659527680