Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column

© 2019, Brazilian Association of Computational Mechanics. All rights reserved. This paper presents cyclic load test of five exterior reinforced concrete frames. All the specimens represent a substandard single-span, low-rise reinforced concrete frame building which behaves a weak column-strong beam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anawat Thipprasert, Chinnapat Buachart, Chayanon Hansapinyo, Suchart Limkatanyu
Format: Journal
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071289462&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66665
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-66665
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-666652019-09-16T12:54:52Z Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column Anawat Thipprasert Chinnapat Buachart Chayanon Hansapinyo Suchart Limkatanyu Engineering Materials Science © 2019, Brazilian Association of Computational Mechanics. All rights reserved. This paper presents cyclic load test of five exterior reinforced concrete frames. All the specimens represent a substandard single-span, low-rise reinforced concrete frame building which behaves a weak column-strong beam mechanism under a strong seismic loading. The first three exterior frames M1, M2 and M3 were designed for the joint shear critical to investigate the effect of joint reinforcement. They are similar except the joint reinforcement detailing. The fourth specimen M4 was an exterior frame with a very small column member. The fifth specimen U5 was the seismic upgrade of M4 specimen using externally attached steel column. From the first three tests, the increase in shear capacity due to the reinforcement provided in the beam-column joint was negligible when the column size was small leading to high joint shear stress. The shear capacity of the specimens was agreed well with the calculation formula provided by ACI318 (ACI, 2008) ignoring the contribution from the reinforcement. The upgraded frame markedly indicated the increased capacity of 2.02 times of the strength of M4 specimen. However, the ductility of the upgraded frame was decreased. It was the result from that the failure mode of the specimen was shifted from the joint failure to the column damage at the section next to the end of the attached steel column. 2019-09-16T12:52:33Z 2019-09-16T12:52:33Z 2019-01-01 Journal 16797825 16797817 2-s2.0-85071289462 10.1590/1679-78255510 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071289462&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66665
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Engineering
Materials Science
spellingShingle Engineering
Materials Science
Anawat Thipprasert
Chinnapat Buachart
Chayanon Hansapinyo
Suchart Limkatanyu
Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
description © 2019, Brazilian Association of Computational Mechanics. All rights reserved. This paper presents cyclic load test of five exterior reinforced concrete frames. All the specimens represent a substandard single-span, low-rise reinforced concrete frame building which behaves a weak column-strong beam mechanism under a strong seismic loading. The first three exterior frames M1, M2 and M3 were designed for the joint shear critical to investigate the effect of joint reinforcement. They are similar except the joint reinforcement detailing. The fourth specimen M4 was an exterior frame with a very small column member. The fifth specimen U5 was the seismic upgrade of M4 specimen using externally attached steel column. From the first three tests, the increase in shear capacity due to the reinforcement provided in the beam-column joint was negligible when the column size was small leading to high joint shear stress. The shear capacity of the specimens was agreed well with the calculation formula provided by ACI318 (ACI, 2008) ignoring the contribution from the reinforcement. The upgraded frame markedly indicated the increased capacity of 2.02 times of the strength of M4 specimen. However, the ductility of the upgraded frame was decreased. It was the result from that the failure mode of the specimen was shifted from the joint failure to the column damage at the section next to the end of the attached steel column.
format Journal
author Anawat Thipprasert
Chinnapat Buachart
Chayanon Hansapinyo
Suchart Limkatanyu
author_facet Anawat Thipprasert
Chinnapat Buachart
Chayanon Hansapinyo
Suchart Limkatanyu
author_sort Anawat Thipprasert
title Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
title_short Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
title_full Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
title_fullStr Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
title_full_unstemmed Seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
title_sort seismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel column
publishDate 2019
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071289462&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66665
_version_ 1681426497549631488