A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients

© 2019 Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention. Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most common complication in pediatric oncology patients. Appropriate empirical antibiotics treatment is essential for treatment outcome. Methods: This study was a randomized prospective controlled st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruchirek Kamonrattana, Lalita Sathitsamitphong, Worawut Choeyprasert, Pimlak Charoenkwan, Rungrote Natesirinilkul, Kanda Fanhchaksai
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072655299&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67628
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-67628
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-676282020-04-02T15:15:22Z A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients Ruchirek Kamonrattana Lalita Sathitsamitphong Worawut Choeyprasert Pimlak Charoenkwan Rungrote Natesirinilkul Kanda Fanhchaksai Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Medicine © 2019 Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention. Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most common complication in pediatric oncology patients. Appropriate empirical antibiotics treatment is essential for treatment outcome. Methods: This study was a randomized prospective controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TZO) monotherapy compared with ceftazidime/amikacin in children with FN. Pediatric oncology patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, diagnosed with FN, were randomized to receive either PIP/TZO 320 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours or ceftazidime 100 mg/kg/ day divided every 8 hours plus amikacin 15 mg/kg/day once daily. Treatment responses were compared between the two groups. Results: One-hundred and eighteen febrile neutropenic episodes in 70 patients (42 males and 28 females) were enrolled. The median age was 7 (3-10) years. The early response and complete response to initial treatment were achieved in 48/59 (81.4%) episodes and 41/59 (69.5%) episodes in PIP/TZO group compared with 40/59 (67.8%) episodes and 33/59 (55.9%) episodes in ceftazidime/amikacin group (p-value 0.091 and 0.128, respectively). Treatment modification in PIP/TZO group was required in 18/59 (30.5%) compared with 26/59 (44.1%) patients in ceftazidime/amikacin group (p-value 0.128). Similarly, the duration of fever, duration of neutropenia and duration of antibiotics treatment were not significantly different between two groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: The treatment responses of PIP/TZO monotherapy and ceftazidime/amikacin therapy were not significantly different. Both therapies were effective for FN in pediatric oncology patients. 2020-04-02T14:57:59Z 2020-04-02T14:57:59Z 2019-01-01 Journal 2476762X 15137368 2-s2.0-85072655299 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2733 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072655299&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67628
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
Ruchirek Kamonrattana
Lalita Sathitsamitphong
Worawut Choeyprasert
Pimlak Charoenkwan
Rungrote Natesirinilkul
Kanda Fanhchaksai
A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
description © 2019 Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention. Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most common complication in pediatric oncology patients. Appropriate empirical antibiotics treatment is essential for treatment outcome. Methods: This study was a randomized prospective controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TZO) monotherapy compared with ceftazidime/amikacin in children with FN. Pediatric oncology patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, diagnosed with FN, were randomized to receive either PIP/TZO 320 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours or ceftazidime 100 mg/kg/ day divided every 8 hours plus amikacin 15 mg/kg/day once daily. Treatment responses were compared between the two groups. Results: One-hundred and eighteen febrile neutropenic episodes in 70 patients (42 males and 28 females) were enrolled. The median age was 7 (3-10) years. The early response and complete response to initial treatment were achieved in 48/59 (81.4%) episodes and 41/59 (69.5%) episodes in PIP/TZO group compared with 40/59 (67.8%) episodes and 33/59 (55.9%) episodes in ceftazidime/amikacin group (p-value 0.091 and 0.128, respectively). Treatment modification in PIP/TZO group was required in 18/59 (30.5%) compared with 26/59 (44.1%) patients in ceftazidime/amikacin group (p-value 0.128). Similarly, the duration of fever, duration of neutropenia and duration of antibiotics treatment were not significantly different between two groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: The treatment responses of PIP/TZO monotherapy and ceftazidime/amikacin therapy were not significantly different. Both therapies were effective for FN in pediatric oncology patients.
format Journal
author Ruchirek Kamonrattana
Lalita Sathitsamitphong
Worawut Choeyprasert
Pimlak Charoenkwan
Rungrote Natesirinilkul
Kanda Fanhchaksai
author_facet Ruchirek Kamonrattana
Lalita Sathitsamitphong
Worawut Choeyprasert
Pimlak Charoenkwan
Rungrote Natesirinilkul
Kanda Fanhchaksai
author_sort Ruchirek Kamonrattana
title A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
title_short A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
title_full A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
title_fullStr A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
title_sort randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled study to assess the efficacy of frontline empirical intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy in comparison with ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072655299&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67628
_version_ 1681426670583545856