Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare patient morbidity and healing outcomes of free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting at palatal donor sites and after using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC). FGG harvesting le...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arada Patarapongsanti, Panwadee Bandhaya, Benyapha Sirinirund, Sakornratana Khongkhunthian, Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075812529&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67768
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-67768
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-677682020-04-02T15:03:32Z Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting Arada Patarapongsanti Panwadee Bandhaya Benyapha Sirinirund Sakornratana Khongkhunthian Pathawee Khongkhunthian Dentistry © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare patient morbidity and healing outcomes of free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting at palatal donor sites and after using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC). FGG harvesting leaves open palatal wounds, which heal by secondary intention. Patients might experience discomfort or pain during the first 2 weeks of healing. METHODS: Eighteen participants requiring two FGG were recruited. The test and control sites were covered with PRF membrane and ORC. The complete epithelialization of the palatal wound, the percentage of wound healing, and postoperative pain were evaluated, 1, 3, and 7 days and 2, 3, and 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Similar wound size reduction at 1 week (test: 36.87%, control: 38.78%) was found. At 2 weeks, the majority of the test group (88.89%) showed complete epithelialization, whereas 66.67% of the control group had complete epithelialization (P = .228). Pain was more prevalent in the control group (27.77%) than in the test group (11.1%) on day 1. None of the participants reported any pain or discomfort at the test sites on day 3. CONCLUSIONS: PRF seems to reduce patient morbidity, but there is no difference in palatal wound healing (P > .05). 2020-04-02T15:03:32Z 2020-04-02T15:03:32Z 2019-11-01 Journal 20411626 2-s2.0-85075812529 10.1111/jicd.12467 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075812529&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67768
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Dentistry
spellingShingle Dentistry
Arada Patarapongsanti
Panwadee Bandhaya
Benyapha Sirinirund
Sakornratana Khongkhunthian
Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
description © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare patient morbidity and healing outcomes of free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting at palatal donor sites and after using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC). FGG harvesting leaves open palatal wounds, which heal by secondary intention. Patients might experience discomfort or pain during the first 2 weeks of healing. METHODS: Eighteen participants requiring two FGG were recruited. The test and control sites were covered with PRF membrane and ORC. The complete epithelialization of the palatal wound, the percentage of wound healing, and postoperative pain were evaluated, 1, 3, and 7 days and 2, 3, and 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Similar wound size reduction at 1 week (test: 36.87%, control: 38.78%) was found. At 2 weeks, the majority of the test group (88.89%) showed complete epithelialization, whereas 66.67% of the control group had complete epithelialization (P = .228). Pain was more prevalent in the control group (27.77%) than in the test group (11.1%) on day 1. None of the participants reported any pain or discomfort at the test sites on day 3. CONCLUSIONS: PRF seems to reduce patient morbidity, but there is no difference in palatal wound healing (P > .05).
format Journal
author Arada Patarapongsanti
Panwadee Bandhaya
Benyapha Sirinirund
Sakornratana Khongkhunthian
Pathawee Khongkhunthian
author_facet Arada Patarapongsanti
Panwadee Bandhaya
Benyapha Sirinirund
Sakornratana Khongkhunthian
Pathawee Khongkhunthian
author_sort Arada Patarapongsanti
title Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
title_short Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
title_full Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
title_fullStr Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
title_sort comparison of platelet-rich fibrin and cellulose in palatal wounds after graft harvesting
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075812529&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67768
_version_ 1681426696181383168