Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review

© 2019, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. In this narrative review article, the authors discuss the anatomy, nomenclature, history, approaches (posterior vs. lateral vs. subcostal), techniques, pharmacology, indications, and complications of transversus abdominis p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: De Q. Tran, Daniela Bravo, Prangmalee Leurcharusmee, Joseph M. Neal
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073307124&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67950
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-67950
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-679502020-04-02T15:12:15Z Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review De Q. Tran Daniela Bravo Prangmalee Leurcharusmee Joseph M. Neal Medicine © 2019, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. In this narrative review article, the authors discuss the anatomy, nomenclature, history, approaches (posterior vs. lateral vs. subcostal), techniques, pharmacology, indications, and complications of transversus abdominis plane blocks, as well as possible alternative truncal blocks. Despite the scarcity of evidence and contradictory findings, certain clinical suggestions can nonetheless be made. Overall transversus abdominis plane blocks appear most beneficial in the setting of open appendectomy (posterior or lateral approach). Lateral transversus abdominis plane blocks are not suggested for laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, or open prostatectomy. However, transversus abdominis plane blocks could serve as an analgesic option for Cesarean delivery (posterior or lateral approach) and open colorectal section (subcostal or lateral approach) if there exist contraindications to intrathecal morphine and thoracic epidural analgesia, respectively. Future investigation is required to compare posterior and subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks in clinical settings. Furthermore, posterior transversus abdominis plane blocks should be investigated for surgical interventions in which their lateral counterparts have proven not to be beneficial (e.g., laparoscopic hysterectomy/appendectomy, open prostatectomy). More importantly, because posterior transversus abdominis plane blocks can purportedly provide sympathetic blockade and visceral analgesia, they should be compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for open colorectal surgery. Finally, transversus abdominis plane blocks should be compared with newer truncal blocks (e.g., erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks) with well-designed and adequately powered trials. 2020-04-02T15:12:15Z 2020-04-02T15:12:15Z 2019-11-01 Journal 15281175 00033022 2-s2.0-85073307124 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002842 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073307124&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67950
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
De Q. Tran
Daniela Bravo
Prangmalee Leurcharusmee
Joseph M. Neal
Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review
description © 2019, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. In this narrative review article, the authors discuss the anatomy, nomenclature, history, approaches (posterior vs. lateral vs. subcostal), techniques, pharmacology, indications, and complications of transversus abdominis plane blocks, as well as possible alternative truncal blocks. Despite the scarcity of evidence and contradictory findings, certain clinical suggestions can nonetheless be made. Overall transversus abdominis plane blocks appear most beneficial in the setting of open appendectomy (posterior or lateral approach). Lateral transversus abdominis plane blocks are not suggested for laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, or open prostatectomy. However, transversus abdominis plane blocks could serve as an analgesic option for Cesarean delivery (posterior or lateral approach) and open colorectal section (subcostal or lateral approach) if there exist contraindications to intrathecal morphine and thoracic epidural analgesia, respectively. Future investigation is required to compare posterior and subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks in clinical settings. Furthermore, posterior transversus abdominis plane blocks should be investigated for surgical interventions in which their lateral counterparts have proven not to be beneficial (e.g., laparoscopic hysterectomy/appendectomy, open prostatectomy). More importantly, because posterior transversus abdominis plane blocks can purportedly provide sympathetic blockade and visceral analgesia, they should be compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for open colorectal surgery. Finally, transversus abdominis plane blocks should be compared with newer truncal blocks (e.g., erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks) with well-designed and adequately powered trials.
format Journal
author De Q. Tran
Daniela Bravo
Prangmalee Leurcharusmee
Joseph M. Neal
author_facet De Q. Tran
Daniela Bravo
Prangmalee Leurcharusmee
Joseph M. Neal
author_sort De Q. Tran
title Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review
title_short Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review
title_full Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review
title_fullStr Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Transversus abdominis plane block: A narrative review
title_sort transversus abdominis plane block: a narrative review
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073307124&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67950
_version_ 1681426730011590656