Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction

© 2019 Elsevier B.V. The inherent structure and substantial information on global terrorism network are often understood by identifying influential nodes. Recently, novel node identification methods are developed from different perspectives. Each of them has trade-offs and strengths. However, the al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanokwan Malang, Shuliang Wang, Aniwat Phaphuangwittayakul, Yuanyuan Lv, Hanning Yuan, Xiuzhen Zhang
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077700485&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68450
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-68450
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-684502020-04-02T15:29:57Z Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction Kanokwan Malang Shuliang Wang Aniwat Phaphuangwittayakul Yuanyuan Lv Hanning Yuan Xiuzhen Zhang Mathematics Physics and Astronomy © 2019 Elsevier B.V. The inherent structure and substantial information on global terrorism network are often understood by identifying influential nodes. Recently, novel node identification methods are developed from different perspectives. Each of them has trade-offs and strengths. However, the algorithms for exploring the key influential nodes have been adopted unevenly in light of network extraction research. A set of nodes that is more favorable to define the core network structure is unclear. In this paper, we, therefore, present a comparative study of node identification methods over the global terrorism network. The new insight each method contributes to identifying key influential nodes and core network structure is investigated. Six comparative methods are verified by the SIR model and monotonicity index. We further elaborate on experimental analysis by applying the critical nodes from each method to extract the skeleton network. All extracted skeletons are eventually compared with the original network in terms of node correlation and network structural-equivalence. Thus, the comparison and results not only used to reflect the potential of different methods to a particular network structure but also guide us to select a method that works best for extracting the skeleton network of real-world global terrorism. 2020-04-02T15:27:37Z 2020-04-02T15:27:37Z 2020-05-01 Journal 03784371 2-s2.0-85077700485 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123769 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077700485&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68450
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
spellingShingle Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
Kanokwan Malang
Shuliang Wang
Aniwat Phaphuangwittayakul
Yuanyuan Lv
Hanning Yuan
Xiuzhen Zhang
Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction
description © 2019 Elsevier B.V. The inherent structure and substantial information on global terrorism network are often understood by identifying influential nodes. Recently, novel node identification methods are developed from different perspectives. Each of them has trade-offs and strengths. However, the algorithms for exploring the key influential nodes have been adopted unevenly in light of network extraction research. A set of nodes that is more favorable to define the core network structure is unclear. In this paper, we, therefore, present a comparative study of node identification methods over the global terrorism network. The new insight each method contributes to identifying key influential nodes and core network structure is investigated. Six comparative methods are verified by the SIR model and monotonicity index. We further elaborate on experimental analysis by applying the critical nodes from each method to extract the skeleton network. All extracted skeletons are eventually compared with the original network in terms of node correlation and network structural-equivalence. Thus, the comparison and results not only used to reflect the potential of different methods to a particular network structure but also guide us to select a method that works best for extracting the skeleton network of real-world global terrorism.
format Journal
author Kanokwan Malang
Shuliang Wang
Aniwat Phaphuangwittayakul
Yuanyuan Lv
Hanning Yuan
Xiuzhen Zhang
author_facet Kanokwan Malang
Shuliang Wang
Aniwat Phaphuangwittayakul
Yuanyuan Lv
Hanning Yuan
Xiuzhen Zhang
author_sort Kanokwan Malang
title Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction
title_short Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction
title_full Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction
title_fullStr Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction
title_full_unstemmed Identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: A comparison for skeleton network extraction
title_sort identifying influential nodes of global terrorism network: a comparison for skeleton network extraction
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077700485&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68450
_version_ 1681426822214975488