Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours

© 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists AIM: To compare the goodness of fit and correlations between diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and a mono-exponential (ME) model, to compare the corrected apparent diffusion coefficient (Dapp) and apparent kurtosis (Kapp) of the DKI model, and the apparent dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. Panyarak, T. Chikui, K. Tokumori, Y. Yamashita, T. Kamitani, O. Togao, K. Yoshiura
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079385106&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68541
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-68541
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-685412020-04-02T15:29:03Z Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours W. Panyarak T. Chikui K. Tokumori Y. Yamashita T. Kamitani O. Togao K. Yoshiura Medicine © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists AIM: To compare the goodness of fit and correlations between diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and a mono-exponential (ME) model, to compare the corrected apparent diffusion coefficient (Dapp) and apparent kurtosis (Kapp) of the DKI model, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the ME model among the various orofacial lesions, and to evaluate the diagnostic performances between the two models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 orofacial lesions underwent echo-planar diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with four b-values. The goodness of fit was evaluated using Akaike information criterion. The correlations of the diffusion-derived parameters were evaluated. The diagnostic performance was analysed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: The DKI model showed a significantly better goodness of fit than the ME model (p<0.0001). The Kapp had a strongly negative correlation with the Dapp (ρ=–0.749) and ADC (ρ=–0.938). A strongly positive correlation existed between the Dapp and ADC (ρ=0.906). All parameters differed significantly between benign tumours and malignant tumours (p<0.05). In differentiating benign tumours from the malignant tumours, the AUC of Dapp (0.871) was larger than that of ADC (0.805); however, a significant difference was not found (p=0.102). CONCLUSION: The DKI model had better goodness of fit than the ME model. Furthermore, the Dapp and Kapp were also characteristic for each pathological category; however, the DKI model did not yield a significantly higher diagnostic performance than the ME model, which might be related to the high correlation among the diffusion-derived parameters and wide variation among categories. 2020-04-02T15:29:03Z 2020-04-02T15:29:03Z 2020-01-01 Journal 1365229X 00099260 2-s2.0-85079385106 10.1016/j.crad.2020.01.008 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079385106&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68541
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
W. Panyarak
T. Chikui
K. Tokumori
Y. Yamashita
T. Kamitani
O. Togao
K. Yoshiura
Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
description © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists AIM: To compare the goodness of fit and correlations between diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and a mono-exponential (ME) model, to compare the corrected apparent diffusion coefficient (Dapp) and apparent kurtosis (Kapp) of the DKI model, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the ME model among the various orofacial lesions, and to evaluate the diagnostic performances between the two models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 orofacial lesions underwent echo-planar diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with four b-values. The goodness of fit was evaluated using Akaike information criterion. The correlations of the diffusion-derived parameters were evaluated. The diagnostic performance was analysed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: The DKI model showed a significantly better goodness of fit than the ME model (p<0.0001). The Kapp had a strongly negative correlation with the Dapp (ρ=–0.749) and ADC (ρ=–0.938). A strongly positive correlation existed between the Dapp and ADC (ρ=0.906). All parameters differed significantly between benign tumours and malignant tumours (p<0.05). In differentiating benign tumours from the malignant tumours, the AUC of Dapp (0.871) was larger than that of ADC (0.805); however, a significant difference was not found (p=0.102). CONCLUSION: The DKI model had better goodness of fit than the ME model. Furthermore, the Dapp and Kapp were also characteristic for each pathological category; however, the DKI model did not yield a significantly higher diagnostic performance than the ME model, which might be related to the high correlation among the diffusion-derived parameters and wide variation among categories.
format Journal
author W. Panyarak
T. Chikui
K. Tokumori
Y. Yamashita
T. Kamitani
O. Togao
K. Yoshiura
author_facet W. Panyarak
T. Chikui
K. Tokumori
Y. Yamashita
T. Kamitani
O. Togao
K. Yoshiura
author_sort W. Panyarak
title Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
title_short Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
title_full Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
title_fullStr Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
title_full_unstemmed Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
title_sort utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079385106&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68541
_version_ 1681426838475243520