Pragmatic accuracy of an in-house loopmediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a Thai community hospital

• Main Authors: Sarawut Toonkomdang, Phichayut Phinyo, Benjawan Phetsuksiri, Jayanton Patumanond, Janisara Rudeeaneksin, Wiphat Klayut
• Format: Journal
• Published: 2020
• Subjects: Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
• Online Access: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088507601&origin=inward; http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70020
• Institution: Chiang Mai University

© 2020 Toonkomdang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background To improve the quality of diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), WHO recommends the use of rapid molecular testing as an alternative to conventional microscopic methods. Loopmediated isothermal amplification assay (LAMP test) is a practical and cost-effective nucleic amplification technique. We evaluated the pragmatic accuracy of an in-house LAMP assay for the diagnosis of TB in a remote health care setting where an advanced rapid molecular test is not available. Methods A prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted. Patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of TB were consecutively enrolled from April to August 2016. Sputum samples were collected from each patient and were sent for microscopic examination (both acid-fast stain and fluorescence stain), in-house LAMP test, and TB culture. Results One hundred and seven patients with TB symptoms were used in the final analysis. This included 50 (46.7%) culture-positive TB patients and 57 (53.3%) culture-negative patients. The overall sensitivity of the in-house LAMP based on culture positivity was 88.8% (95/107) with a 95%CI of 81.2-94.1. The sensitivity was 90.9% (40/44) with a 95%CI of 78.3-97.5 for smear-positive, culture-positive patients, and was 16.7% (1/6) with a 95%CI of 0.4-64.1 for smear-negative, culture-positive patients. The overall sensitivity of the in-house LAMP test compared to smear microscopy methods were not significantly different (p = 0.375). The specificity of the in-house LAMP based on non-TB patients (smear-negative, culture-negative) was 94.7% (54/57) with a 95%CI of 85.4-98.9. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of the in-house LAMP test in a community hospital was comparable to other previous reports in terms of specificity. The sensitivity of the in-house assay could be improved with better sputum processing and DNA extraction method. Copyright: