Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study

© 2020 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between the plasma volume treated by double filtration plasmapheresis and allograft outcomes for the treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kajohnsak Noppakun, Thanapat Kittipanyaworakun, Chidchanok Ruengorn, Surachet Vongsanim, Anchalee Saikam, Nikhom Khamlueang
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089448647&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70895
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-70895
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-708952020-10-14T08:44:24Z Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study Kajohnsak Noppakun Thanapat Kittipanyaworakun Chidchanok Ruengorn Surachet Vongsanim Anchalee Saikam Nikhom Khamlueang Medicine © 2020 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between the plasma volume treated by double filtration plasmapheresis and allograft outcomes for the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, plasma volume treated between 1 and <1.3 total plasma volume and group 2, plasma volume treated ≥1.3 total plasma volume. Primary outcome was ≥50% reduction of serum creatinine rising from baseline value at 1 month. A total of 32 courses (146 sessions) of double filtration plasmapheresis were performed; 17 and 15 courses in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 41% of group 1 and 40% of group 2 (adjusted risk ratio 1.15 [95%CI, 0.48-2.76]). Graft loss at 1 year did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65 [95%CI, 0.23-1.87]). Infection tendency seemed to be higher in group 2 (40% vs 18%, P =.243). 2020-10-14T08:44:24Z 2020-10-14T08:44:24Z 2020-01-01 Journal 17449987 17449979 2-s2.0-85089448647 10.1111/1744-9987.13560 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089448647&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70895
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Chiang Mai University Library
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Kajohnsak Noppakun
Thanapat Kittipanyaworakun
Chidchanok Ruengorn
Surachet Vongsanim
Anchalee Saikam
Nikhom Khamlueang
Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
description © 2020 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between the plasma volume treated by double filtration plasmapheresis and allograft outcomes for the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, plasma volume treated between 1 and <1.3 total plasma volume and group 2, plasma volume treated ≥1.3 total plasma volume. Primary outcome was ≥50% reduction of serum creatinine rising from baseline value at 1 month. A total of 32 courses (146 sessions) of double filtration plasmapheresis were performed; 17 and 15 courses in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 41% of group 1 and 40% of group 2 (adjusted risk ratio 1.15 [95%CI, 0.48-2.76]). Graft loss at 1 year did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65 [95%CI, 0.23-1.87]). Infection tendency seemed to be higher in group 2 (40% vs 18%, P =.243).
format Journal
author Kajohnsak Noppakun
Thanapat Kittipanyaworakun
Chidchanok Ruengorn
Surachet Vongsanim
Anchalee Saikam
Nikhom Khamlueang
author_facet Kajohnsak Noppakun
Thanapat Kittipanyaworakun
Chidchanok Ruengorn
Surachet Vongsanim
Anchalee Saikam
Nikhom Khamlueang
author_sort Kajohnsak Noppakun
title Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089448647&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70895
_version_ 1681752986059014144