Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals

© 2020, © 2020 Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences. There are currently no forensic methods for distinguishing Thais from other individuals of Asian ancestry using craniometrics. Of foreigners visiting or living in Thailand, Japanese people predominate. Remains of Japanese soldiers from the Seco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natthamon Pureepatpong Kongkasuriyachai, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, D. Troy Case, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087990664&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70936
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-70936
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-709362020-10-14T08:45:06Z Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals Natthamon Pureepatpong Kongkasuriyachai Sukon Prasitwattanaseree D. Troy Case Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh Medicine © 2020, © 2020 Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences. There are currently no forensic methods for distinguishing Thais from other individuals of Asian ancestry using craniometrics. Of foreigners visiting or living in Thailand, Japanese people predominate. Remains of Japanese soldiers from the Second World War were excavated in northern Thailand, and hundreds more are thought to have disappeared in this area and nearby countries. This research aims to develop new formulae for ancestry estimation of skulls suspected to be Thai or Japanese. This was achieved by measuring 440 Thai and Japanese skulls. Stepwise discriminant analysis created four formulae. The first formula is for a complete skull, with predicted and correct classification accuracy of 89.3% and tested accuracy of 91.2%. The second formula, cranium only, gave 84.3% predicted and correct classification accuracy and tested accuracy of 85.3%. The third formula, for a male skull, gave predicted and correct classification accuracy of 92.0% and tested accuracy of 85.3%. The fourth formula, for a female skull, produced 89.8% predicted and correct classification accuracy and tested accuracy of 88.2%. Differentiating between Asian subgroups is challenging, but this study demonstrates the potential to distinguish Thai from Japanese individuals in forensic applications. It can be used to clarify ancestry of ‘Asian’ unclaimed bodies found in Thailand. 2020-10-14T08:45:06Z 2020-10-14T08:45:06Z 2020-01-01 Journal 1834562X 00450618 2-s2.0-85087990664 10.1080/00450618.2020.1789219 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087990664&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70936
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Chiang Mai University Library
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Natthamon Pureepatpong Kongkasuriyachai
Sukon Prasitwattanaseree
D. Troy Case
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals
description © 2020, © 2020 Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences. There are currently no forensic methods for distinguishing Thais from other individuals of Asian ancestry using craniometrics. Of foreigners visiting or living in Thailand, Japanese people predominate. Remains of Japanese soldiers from the Second World War were excavated in northern Thailand, and hundreds more are thought to have disappeared in this area and nearby countries. This research aims to develop new formulae for ancestry estimation of skulls suspected to be Thai or Japanese. This was achieved by measuring 440 Thai and Japanese skulls. Stepwise discriminant analysis created four formulae. The first formula is for a complete skull, with predicted and correct classification accuracy of 89.3% and tested accuracy of 91.2%. The second formula, cranium only, gave 84.3% predicted and correct classification accuracy and tested accuracy of 85.3%. The third formula, for a male skull, gave predicted and correct classification accuracy of 92.0% and tested accuracy of 85.3%. The fourth formula, for a female skull, produced 89.8% predicted and correct classification accuracy and tested accuracy of 88.2%. Differentiating between Asian subgroups is challenging, but this study demonstrates the potential to distinguish Thai from Japanese individuals in forensic applications. It can be used to clarify ancestry of ‘Asian’ unclaimed bodies found in Thailand.
format Journal
author Natthamon Pureepatpong Kongkasuriyachai
Sukon Prasitwattanaseree
D. Troy Case
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
author_facet Natthamon Pureepatpong Kongkasuriyachai
Sukon Prasitwattanaseree
D. Troy Case
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
author_sort Natthamon Pureepatpong Kongkasuriyachai
title Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals
title_short Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals
title_full Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals
title_fullStr Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals
title_full_unstemmed Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals
title_sort craniometric estimation of ancestry in thai and japanese individuals
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087990664&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70936
_version_ 1681752993471397888