Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0

© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Objective: To assess interrater and intrarater reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Urodynamic Basic Data Set (UBS) version 1.0. Setting: Urodynamic clinic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kittamet Dejkriengkraikul, Sintip Pattanakuhar, Tuankasfee Hama, Siam Tongprasert
Format: Journal
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086167588&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70953
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-70953
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-709532020-10-14T08:46:20Z Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0 Kittamet Dejkriengkraikul Sintip Pattanakuhar Tuankasfee Hama Siam Tongprasert Medicine Neuroscience © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Objective: To assess interrater and intrarater reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Urodynamic Basic Data Set (UBS) version 1.0. Setting: Urodynamic clinic at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. Methods: Two raters independently analyzed urodynamic tracings from 50 patients and completed the UBS twice, each test 1 month apart. The interrater and intrarater reliability of this data set were analyzed using Kappa, Weighted Kappa, and the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Of the 50 patients, 72% were male. The mean (SD) age was 48.2 (16.6) years. The median time (IQR) since the injury was 27 months (0–101 months). The interrater reliability of the items of UBS were substantial to almost perfect (0.78–0.99). The intrarater reliability of the first rater was fair to almost perfect (0.37–1.00). The intrarater reliability of the second rater was moderate to almost perfect (0.51–1.00). Relatively low interrater and intrarater reliability were observed in bladder compliance and urethral function items. Conclusion: The first version of UBS has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability on most items. Although bladder compliance and urethral function have problematic interrater and intrarater reliability, they have been adjusted in the second version. Due to its simplicity and reliability, UBS is clinically useful for urodynamic assessment in people with SCI. 2020-10-14T08:45:28Z 2020-10-14T08:45:28Z 2020-01-01 Journal 14765624 13624393 2-s2.0-85086167588 10.1038/s41393-020-0496-5 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086167588&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70953
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Chiang Mai University Library
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
Neuroscience
spellingShingle Medicine
Neuroscience
Kittamet Dejkriengkraikul
Sintip Pattanakuhar
Tuankasfee Hama
Siam Tongprasert
Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
description © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Objective: To assess interrater and intrarater reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Urodynamic Basic Data Set (UBS) version 1.0. Setting: Urodynamic clinic at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. Methods: Two raters independently analyzed urodynamic tracings from 50 patients and completed the UBS twice, each test 1 month apart. The interrater and intrarater reliability of this data set were analyzed using Kappa, Weighted Kappa, and the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Of the 50 patients, 72% were male. The mean (SD) age was 48.2 (16.6) years. The median time (IQR) since the injury was 27 months (0–101 months). The interrater reliability of the items of UBS were substantial to almost perfect (0.78–0.99). The intrarater reliability of the first rater was fair to almost perfect (0.37–1.00). The intrarater reliability of the second rater was moderate to almost perfect (0.51–1.00). Relatively low interrater and intrarater reliability were observed in bladder compliance and urethral function items. Conclusion: The first version of UBS has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability on most items. Although bladder compliance and urethral function have problematic interrater and intrarater reliability, they have been adjusted in the second version. Due to its simplicity and reliability, UBS is clinically useful for urodynamic assessment in people with SCI.
format Journal
author Kittamet Dejkriengkraikul
Sintip Pattanakuhar
Tuankasfee Hama
Siam Tongprasert
author_facet Kittamet Dejkriengkraikul
Sintip Pattanakuhar
Tuankasfee Hama
Siam Tongprasert
author_sort Kittamet Dejkriengkraikul
title Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
title_short Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
title_full Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
title_fullStr Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
title_sort reliability of the international spinal cord injury urodynamic basic data set version 1.0
publishDate 2020
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086167588&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70953
_version_ 1681752996578328576