Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease

Objective. To test the predictions of the Challenge Point Framework (CPF) for motor learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) by manipulating nominal task difficulty and conditions of practice. Methods. Twenty adults with PD and 20 nondisabled controls practiced 3 variations of a la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Onla-Or S., Winstein C.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-45449098533&partnerID=40&md5=6d98f27849ec715cdc8ac146a161d587
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18326891
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/728
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-728
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-7282014-08-29T09:02:01Z Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease Onla-Or S. Winstein C.J. Objective. To test the predictions of the Challenge Point Framework (CPF) for motor learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) by manipulating nominal task difficulty and conditions of practice. Methods. Twenty adults with PD and 20 nondisabled controls practiced 3 variations of a laboratory-based goal-directed arm movement over 2 days. A between-group (PD, nondisabled) 2-factor design compared 2 levels of nominal task difficulty (low, high) and 2 levels of practice condition (low, high demand). Learning was assessed with a no-feedback recall test 1 day after practice. Performance was quantified using a root mean square error difference between the goal and participant-generated movement. Results. All participants improved with practice. Under the low-demand practice condition, adults with PD demonstrated comparable learning to that of controls when nominal task difficulty was low but not high. In contrast, under the high-demand practice condition, adults with PD demonstrated preserved motor learning for both levels of task difficulty, but only if recall was tested under the same context as that used during practice. Conclusions. In general, the predictions of CPF were supported. Together, the level of nominal task difficulty and the inherent demand of the practice condition played a critical role in determining the optimal challenge point for motor learning in individuals with PD. More important, and in contrast to the predictions of CPF, a high-demand practice condition appeared to have a facilitative effect on motor learning. However, this benefit revealed the context specificity of motor learning in adults with PD. Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Neurorehabilitation. 2014-08-29T09:02:01Z 2014-08-29T09:02:01Z 2008 Article 15459683 10.1177/1545968307313508 18326891 JNRHF http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-45449098533&partnerID=40&md5=6d98f27849ec715cdc8ac146a161d587 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18326891 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/728 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective. To test the predictions of the Challenge Point Framework (CPF) for motor learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) by manipulating nominal task difficulty and conditions of practice. Methods. Twenty adults with PD and 20 nondisabled controls practiced 3 variations of a laboratory-based goal-directed arm movement over 2 days. A between-group (PD, nondisabled) 2-factor design compared 2 levels of nominal task difficulty (low, high) and 2 levels of practice condition (low, high demand). Learning was assessed with a no-feedback recall test 1 day after practice. Performance was quantified using a root mean square error difference between the goal and participant-generated movement. Results. All participants improved with practice. Under the low-demand practice condition, adults with PD demonstrated comparable learning to that of controls when nominal task difficulty was low but not high. In contrast, under the high-demand practice condition, adults with PD demonstrated preserved motor learning for both levels of task difficulty, but only if recall was tested under the same context as that used during practice. Conclusions. In general, the predictions of CPF were supported. Together, the level of nominal task difficulty and the inherent demand of the practice condition played a critical role in determining the optimal challenge point for motor learning in individuals with PD. More important, and in contrast to the predictions of CPF, a high-demand practice condition appeared to have a facilitative effect on motor learning. However, this benefit revealed the context specificity of motor learning in adults with PD. Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Neurorehabilitation.
format Article
author Onla-Or S.
Winstein C.J.
spellingShingle Onla-Or S.
Winstein C.J.
Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease
author_facet Onla-Or S.
Winstein C.J.
author_sort Onla-Or S.
title Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease
title_short Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease
title_full Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease
title_fullStr Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease
title_full_unstemmed Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease
title_sort determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe parkinson's disease
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-45449098533&partnerID=40&md5=6d98f27849ec715cdc8ac146a161d587
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18326891
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/728
_version_ 1681419537579245568