Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand

Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and case-control studies were conducted to describe the epidemiology of Campylobacter in chickens, swine, dairy cows, farm workers, nonfarm residents, and children with diarrhea. Samples were collected in Chiang Mai and Lamphung provinces of northern Thailand from 2000...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Padungtod P., Kaneene J.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-28644440642&partnerID=40&md5=5d7b8a15ae89f364ed03f4137a807665
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16355821
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/7452
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-7452
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-74522014-08-30T04:11:34Z Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand Padungtod P. Kaneene J.B. Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and case-control studies were conducted to describe the epidemiology of Campylobacter in chickens, swine, dairy cows, farm workers, nonfarm residents, and children with diarrhea. Samples were collected in Chiang Mai and Lamphung provinces of northern Thailand from 2000 through 2003. A total of 2,360 samples were processed. Results from the cross-sectional study indicated that the prevalences of Campylobacter in chickens at the farm, slaughterhouse, and market were 64, 38, and 47%, respectively. In swine, the prevalences at the farm, slaughterhouse, and market were 73, 69, and 23%, respectively. Campylobacter prevalence was 14% in dairy cows and 5% in raw milk. The prevalence of Campylobacter on farms was lower in environmental samples than in samples collected from live animals. No Campylobacter isolates were obtained from healthy nonfarm residents, but isolates were obtained from 5 and 18% of farm workers and children with diarrhea, respectively. The prevalence of Campylobacter in pigs in the longitudinal study was 61% at the farm, 46% at the slaughterhouse, and 33% at the market. The majority of Campylobacter isolates from chickens (52%), swine (98%), and farm workers (66%) were Campylobacter coli, whereas the majority of isolates from dairy cows (63%) and children with diarrhea (62%) were Campylobacter jejuni. Most Campylobacter isolates from diarrheal children had single-strand conformation polymorphism profiles similar to those of isolates from chickens. None of the risk factors for infection in children with diarrhea were significantly associated with the isolation of Campylobacter. Copyright ©. International Association for Food Protection. 2014-08-30T04:11:34Z 2014-08-30T04:11:34Z 2005 Article 0362028X 16355821 JFPRD http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-28644440642&partnerID=40&md5=5d7b8a15ae89f364ed03f4137a807665 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16355821 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/7452 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and case-control studies were conducted to describe the epidemiology of Campylobacter in chickens, swine, dairy cows, farm workers, nonfarm residents, and children with diarrhea. Samples were collected in Chiang Mai and Lamphung provinces of northern Thailand from 2000 through 2003. A total of 2,360 samples were processed. Results from the cross-sectional study indicated that the prevalences of Campylobacter in chickens at the farm, slaughterhouse, and market were 64, 38, and 47%, respectively. In swine, the prevalences at the farm, slaughterhouse, and market were 73, 69, and 23%, respectively. Campylobacter prevalence was 14% in dairy cows and 5% in raw milk. The prevalence of Campylobacter on farms was lower in environmental samples than in samples collected from live animals. No Campylobacter isolates were obtained from healthy nonfarm residents, but isolates were obtained from 5 and 18% of farm workers and children with diarrhea, respectively. The prevalence of Campylobacter in pigs in the longitudinal study was 61% at the farm, 46% at the slaughterhouse, and 33% at the market. The majority of Campylobacter isolates from chickens (52%), swine (98%), and farm workers (66%) were Campylobacter coli, whereas the majority of isolates from dairy cows (63%) and children with diarrhea (62%) were Campylobacter jejuni. Most Campylobacter isolates from diarrheal children had single-strand conformation polymorphism profiles similar to those of isolates from chickens. None of the risk factors for infection in children with diarrhea were significantly associated with the isolation of Campylobacter. Copyright ©. International Association for Food Protection.
format Article
author Padungtod P.
Kaneene J.B.
spellingShingle Padungtod P.
Kaneene J.B.
Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand
author_facet Padungtod P.
Kaneene J.B.
author_sort Padungtod P.
title Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand
title_short Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand
title_full Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand
title_fullStr Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern Thailand
title_sort campylobacter in food animals and humans in northern thailand
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-28644440642&partnerID=40&md5=5d7b8a15ae89f364ed03f4137a807665
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16355821
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/7452
_version_ 1681420802507931648