Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine

Certain metabolic transformations of drugs occurring in animals can be attributed exclusively to the activity of the intestinal flora. These include the formation of meta-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (MHPAA) from dopamine and the release of sulfapyridine from sulfasalazine. The time of appearance of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amnuay Thithapandha
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10331
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.10331
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.103312018-03-22T16:30:54Z Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine Amnuay Thithapandha Mahidol University Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Certain metabolic transformations of drugs occurring in animals can be attributed exclusively to the activity of the intestinal flora. These include the formation of meta-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (MHPAA) from dopamine and the release of sulfapyridine from sulfasalazine. The time of appearance of these metabolites in the urine after drug administration might reflect alterations in the host's bacterial flora as in bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. In order to test this concept, self-filling blind loops were created in the jejuna of conventional rats. When dopamine (100 mg) was administered to both control and blind-loop animals, the ratio of MHPAA excreted in the first 24 hours to that in the second 24 hours averaged 12.2 (range 3.8 to 44) in animals with blind loops and 0.09 (range 0 to 0.16) in controls. The presence of a blind loop did not affect the excretion of homovanillic acid and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, urinary metabolites of dopamine not derived from bacterial metabolism. Similar conclusion was also drawn from studies with sulfasalazine (10 mg). A significantly greater quantity of sulfapyridine was excreted in the first 6 hours in rats with blind loops than in controls. These studies indicate that the presence of a blind loop of the rat's small intestine is associated with significant alteration in the kinetics of urinary excretion of flora dependent metabolites of dopamine and sulfasalazine. This observation might serve as the basis for a new method of detecting bacterial overgrowth. © 1977 The Italian Pharmacological Society. 2018-03-22T09:30:54Z 2018-03-22T09:30:54Z 1977-01-01 Article Pharmacological Research Communications. Vol.9, No.3 (1977), 269-277 10.1016/S0031-6989(77)80076-3 00316989 2-s2.0-0017062236 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10331 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0017062236&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
spellingShingle Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Amnuay Thithapandha
Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
description Certain metabolic transformations of drugs occurring in animals can be attributed exclusively to the activity of the intestinal flora. These include the formation of meta-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (MHPAA) from dopamine and the release of sulfapyridine from sulfasalazine. The time of appearance of these metabolites in the urine after drug administration might reflect alterations in the host's bacterial flora as in bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. In order to test this concept, self-filling blind loops were created in the jejuna of conventional rats. When dopamine (100 mg) was administered to both control and blind-loop animals, the ratio of MHPAA excreted in the first 24 hours to that in the second 24 hours averaged 12.2 (range 3.8 to 44) in animals with blind loops and 0.09 (range 0 to 0.16) in controls. The presence of a blind loop did not affect the excretion of homovanillic acid and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, urinary metabolites of dopamine not derived from bacterial metabolism. Similar conclusion was also drawn from studies with sulfasalazine (10 mg). A significantly greater quantity of sulfapyridine was excreted in the first 6 hours in rats with blind loops than in controls. These studies indicate that the presence of a blind loop of the rat's small intestine is associated with significant alteration in the kinetics of urinary excretion of flora dependent metabolites of dopamine and sulfasalazine. This observation might serve as the basis for a new method of detecting bacterial overgrowth. © 1977 The Italian Pharmacological Society.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Amnuay Thithapandha
format Article
author Amnuay Thithapandha
author_sort Amnuay Thithapandha
title Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
title_short Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
title_full Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
title_fullStr Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
title_full_unstemmed Influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
title_sort influence of blind loop on the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and sulfasalazine
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10331
_version_ 1763495696153968640