Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
Objective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users. Material and Method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10938 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
Language: | English |
id |
th-mahidol.10938 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.109382023-04-12T15:20:56Z Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers การทำงานของกล้ามเนื้อช่วยเสริมความมั่นคงของหลังส่วนล่างระหว่างการยกของที่สวมและไม่สวมเข็มขัดพยุงหลังในกลุ่มพนักงานที่มีประสบการณ์ Nopporn Kurustien Keerin Mekhora Wattana Jalayondeja Suebsak Nanthavanij Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy Abdominal support Electromyography Ergonomics Material handling Transversus abdominis muscle Objective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users. Material and Method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44 years, were assessed for trunk stabilizer muscle EMG activity, including the rectus abdominis (RA), external abdominal oblique (EO), transversus abdominis (TrA), internal abdominal oblique (IO), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF). The EMG data were recorded during (1) rest and (2) the initial phase of manual lifting in a dynamic semi-squat posture. For both conditions, the data were compared with and without wearing a back belt. Results: The results showed that wearing a back belt significantly decreased TrA/IO activity during rest (p < 0.01) and significantly increased RA activity during the lifting period (p < 0.05) as compared with the condition of no back belt. Conclusion: The present study does not recommend healthy workers wear a back belt as a protective device for lower back injury, particularly without any lifting activity. However, the back belt can be applied during lifting as it can enhance RA activity, which may help improve abdominal pressure and is less likely cause weakness of the TrA. 2018-04-23T15:14:05Z 2018-04-23T15:14:05Z 2018-04 2014 Article Journal of the medical association of Thailand. Vol.97, No.7 (2014), S75-S79 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10938 eng Mahidol University The Medical Association of Thailand |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
language |
English |
topic |
Abdominal support Electromyography Ergonomics Material handling Transversus abdominis muscle |
spellingShingle |
Abdominal support Electromyography Ergonomics Material handling Transversus abdominis muscle Nopporn Kurustien Keerin Mekhora Wattana Jalayondeja Suebsak Nanthavanij Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
description |
Objective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users.
Material and Method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44 years, were assessed for trunk stabilizer muscle EMG activity, including the rectus abdominis (RA), external abdominal oblique (EO), transversus abdominis (TrA), internal abdominal oblique (IO), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF). The EMG data were recorded during (1) rest and (2) the initial phase of manual lifting in a dynamic semi-squat posture. For both conditions, the data were compared with and without wearing a back belt.
Results: The results showed that wearing a back belt significantly decreased TrA/IO activity during rest (p < 0.01) and significantly increased RA activity during the lifting period (p < 0.05) as compared with the condition of no back belt.
Conclusion: The present study does not recommend healthy workers wear a back belt as a protective device for lower back injury, particularly without any lifting activity. However, the back belt can be applied during lifting as it can enhance RA activity, which may help improve abdominal pressure and is less likely cause weakness of the TrA. |
author2 |
Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy |
author_facet |
Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy Nopporn Kurustien Keerin Mekhora Wattana Jalayondeja Suebsak Nanthavanij |
format |
Article |
author |
Nopporn Kurustien Keerin Mekhora Wattana Jalayondeja Suebsak Nanthavanij |
author_sort |
Nopporn Kurustien |
title |
Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
title_short |
Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
title_full |
Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
title_fullStr |
Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
title_sort |
trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10938 |
_version_ |
1781415167092850688 |