Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers

Objective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users. Material and Method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nopporn Kurustien, Keerin Mekhora, Wattana Jalayondeja, Suebsak Nanthavanij
Other Authors: Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10938
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
Language: English
id th-mahidol.10938
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.109382023-04-12T15:20:56Z Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers การทำงานของกล้ามเนื้อช่วยเสริมความมั่นคงของหลังส่วนล่างระหว่างการยกของที่สวมและไม่สวมเข็มขัดพยุงหลังในกลุ่มพนักงานที่มีประสบการณ์ Nopporn Kurustien Keerin Mekhora Wattana Jalayondeja Suebsak Nanthavanij Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy Abdominal support Electromyography Ergonomics Material handling Transversus abdominis muscle Objective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users. Material and Method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44 years, were assessed for trunk stabilizer muscle EMG activity, including the rectus abdominis (RA), external abdominal oblique (EO), transversus abdominis (TrA), internal abdominal oblique (IO), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF). The EMG data were recorded during (1) rest and (2) the initial phase of manual lifting in a dynamic semi-squat posture. For both conditions, the data were compared with and without wearing a back belt. Results: The results showed that wearing a back belt significantly decreased TrA/IO activity during rest (p < 0.01) and significantly increased RA activity during the lifting period (p < 0.05) as compared with the condition of no back belt. Conclusion: The present study does not recommend healthy workers wear a back belt as a protective device for lower back injury, particularly without any lifting activity. However, the back belt can be applied during lifting as it can enhance RA activity, which may help improve abdominal pressure and is less likely cause weakness of the TrA. 2018-04-23T15:14:05Z 2018-04-23T15:14:05Z 2018-04 2014 Article Journal of the medical association of Thailand. Vol.97, No.7 (2014), S75-S79 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10938 eng Mahidol University The Medical Association of Thailand
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
language English
topic Abdominal support
Electromyography
Ergonomics
Material handling
Transversus abdominis muscle
spellingShingle Abdominal support
Electromyography
Ergonomics
Material handling
Transversus abdominis muscle
Nopporn Kurustien
Keerin Mekhora
Wattana Jalayondeja
Suebsak Nanthavanij
Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
description Objective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users. Material and Method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44 years, were assessed for trunk stabilizer muscle EMG activity, including the rectus abdominis (RA), external abdominal oblique (EO), transversus abdominis (TrA), internal abdominal oblique (IO), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF). The EMG data were recorded during (1) rest and (2) the initial phase of manual lifting in a dynamic semi-squat posture. For both conditions, the data were compared with and without wearing a back belt. Results: The results showed that wearing a back belt significantly decreased TrA/IO activity during rest (p < 0.01) and significantly increased RA activity during the lifting period (p < 0.05) as compared with the condition of no back belt. Conclusion: The present study does not recommend healthy workers wear a back belt as a protective device for lower back injury, particularly without any lifting activity. However, the back belt can be applied during lifting as it can enhance RA activity, which may help improve abdominal pressure and is less likely cause weakness of the TrA.
author2 Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy
author_facet Mahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapy
Nopporn Kurustien
Keerin Mekhora
Wattana Jalayondeja
Suebsak Nanthavanij
format Article
author Nopporn Kurustien
Keerin Mekhora
Wattana Jalayondeja
Suebsak Nanthavanij
author_sort Nopporn Kurustien
title Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
title_short Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
title_full Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
title_fullStr Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
title_full_unstemmed Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
title_sort trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/10938
_version_ 1781415167092850688