Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery

Background: Bacteria need to be eliminated for skin preparation in minor hand surgery. The standard method of skin preparation uses an antiseptic scrub and antiseptic solution, which is expensive and time-consuming. Objective: Design a "double-painted antiseptic application method", and co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chusak Kijkunasathian, Kulchale Phetcharat, Patarawan Woratanarat, Pitak Suntiniran, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Nadhaporn Saengpetch
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11457
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.11457
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.114572018-05-03T15:24:32Z Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery Chusak Kijkunasathian Kulchale Phetcharat Patarawan Woratanarat Pitak Suntiniran Sasivimol Rattanasiri Nadhaporn Saengpetch Mahidol University Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Medicine Background: Bacteria need to be eliminated for skin preparation in minor hand surgery. The standard method of skin preparation uses an antiseptic scrub and antiseptic solution, which is expensive and time-consuming. Objective: Design a "double-painted antiseptic application method", and compare the effectiveness of eliminating bacteria at the area around the hand and wrist between the standard method and the double-painted antiseptic application method. Methods: This cross-over designed experimental study was performed on seven volunteers. The standard and the double-painted antiseptic application method were alternately used for skin preparation around the hand, wrist, and half of the forearm. The bacterial colony counts were collected before, immediately after, and at 45 minutes after skin preparation by using the modified glove-juice technique. The primary outcomes were the eradication rate and the number of bacterial colonies. Results: There was no statistical difference in bacterial colonies between either method before skin preparation. The median of bacterial colony counts immediately after and at 45 minutes after skin preparation were zero colony forming units per milliliter in both methods. The eradication rate was 61.5% and 76.9% in the standard and double-painted antiseptic application method, respectively, for a risk difference of -15.4. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.67). Conclusion: The number of bacterial colonies and eradication rate were not significantly different between either method. The double-painted antiseptic application method can be used instead of the standard method for the skin preparation in minor hand surgery, which has an expected duration of about 45 minutes or less. 2018-05-03T07:59:59Z 2018-05-03T07:59:59Z 2011-10-01 Article Asian Biomedicine. Vol.5, No.5 (2011), 675-680 10.5372/1905-7415.0505.088 1875855X 19057415 2-s2.0-84870556964 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11457 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84870556964&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
Chusak Kijkunasathian
Kulchale Phetcharat
Patarawan Woratanarat
Pitak Suntiniran
Sasivimol Rattanasiri
Nadhaporn Saengpetch
Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
description Background: Bacteria need to be eliminated for skin preparation in minor hand surgery. The standard method of skin preparation uses an antiseptic scrub and antiseptic solution, which is expensive and time-consuming. Objective: Design a "double-painted antiseptic application method", and compare the effectiveness of eliminating bacteria at the area around the hand and wrist between the standard method and the double-painted antiseptic application method. Methods: This cross-over designed experimental study was performed on seven volunteers. The standard and the double-painted antiseptic application method were alternately used for skin preparation around the hand, wrist, and half of the forearm. The bacterial colony counts were collected before, immediately after, and at 45 minutes after skin preparation by using the modified glove-juice technique. The primary outcomes were the eradication rate and the number of bacterial colonies. Results: There was no statistical difference in bacterial colonies between either method before skin preparation. The median of bacterial colony counts immediately after and at 45 minutes after skin preparation were zero colony forming units per milliliter in both methods. The eradication rate was 61.5% and 76.9% in the standard and double-painted antiseptic application method, respectively, for a risk difference of -15.4. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.67). Conclusion: The number of bacterial colonies and eradication rate were not significantly different between either method. The double-painted antiseptic application method can be used instead of the standard method for the skin preparation in minor hand surgery, which has an expected duration of about 45 minutes or less.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Chusak Kijkunasathian
Kulchale Phetcharat
Patarawan Woratanarat
Pitak Suntiniran
Sasivimol Rattanasiri
Nadhaporn Saengpetch
format Article
author Chusak Kijkunasathian
Kulchale Phetcharat
Patarawan Woratanarat
Pitak Suntiniran
Sasivimol Rattanasiri
Nadhaporn Saengpetch
author_sort Chusak Kijkunasathian
title Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
title_short Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
title_full Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
title_sort comparison of bacterial eradication between standard and double-painted antiseptic application method in minor hand surgery
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11457
_version_ 1763490361331679232