Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections
Common complications of implant restorations are abutment screw loosening and screw fracture. The geometry of the implant-abutment connection may affect stresses generated from loading, and these stresses may have a role in screw loosening or fracture. This study compared the load transfer character...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11821 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.11821 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.118212018-05-03T15:09:54Z Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections Pattapon Asvanund Steven M. Morgano Mahidol University Boston University Dentistry Common complications of implant restorations are abutment screw loosening and screw fracture. The geometry of the implant-abutment connection may affect stresses generated from loading, and these stresses may have a role in screw loosening or fracture. This study compared the load transfer characteristics of a complete-arch restoration supported by 4 implants with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Loads were applied to the prostheses in 3 positions. Two-dimensional photoelastic models were used to simulate bone. Two types of implants (ReplaceSelect Internal-Interface Tapered Implants and ReplaceSelect External-Interface Tapered Implants) were placed in the photoelastic models. Complete-arch metal frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Artificial teeth were arranged on the framework, and the prosthesis was screwed onto the abutments. The specimens were analyzed at 2 levels (implant-abutment level and apical to the implant level) with 3 loading conditions (4-point load; 2-point anterior load; and 2-point lateral load). The numbers of fringe orders were recorded and compared. With the 4-point load, no stress differences occurred between the external-implant abutment connection and internal-implant abutment connection at the connection level and at the apical level. With the 2-point anterior load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level both in the loaded and non-loaded areas. With the 2-point lateral load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level at the non-loaded area. When loaded off-center, the internal-implant abutment connection produced less stress when compared with the external-implant abutment connection. © 2011 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018-05-03T08:09:54Z 2018-05-03T08:09:54Z 2011-10-01 Article Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Vol.106, No.4 (2011), 266-271 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5 00223913 2-s2.0-80053345427 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11821 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053345427&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Dentistry |
spellingShingle |
Dentistry Pattapon Asvanund Steven M. Morgano Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
description |
Common complications of implant restorations are abutment screw loosening and screw fracture. The geometry of the implant-abutment connection may affect stresses generated from loading, and these stresses may have a role in screw loosening or fracture. This study compared the load transfer characteristics of a complete-arch restoration supported by 4 implants with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Loads were applied to the prostheses in 3 positions. Two-dimensional photoelastic models were used to simulate bone. Two types of implants (ReplaceSelect Internal-Interface Tapered Implants and ReplaceSelect External-Interface Tapered Implants) were placed in the photoelastic models. Complete-arch metal frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Artificial teeth were arranged on the framework, and the prosthesis was screwed onto the abutments. The specimens were analyzed at 2 levels (implant-abutment level and apical to the implant level) with 3 loading conditions (4-point load; 2-point anterior load; and 2-point lateral load). The numbers of fringe orders were recorded and compared. With the 4-point load, no stress differences occurred between the external-implant abutment connection and internal-implant abutment connection at the connection level and at the apical level. With the 2-point anterior load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level both in the loaded and non-loaded areas. With the 2-point lateral load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level at the non-loaded area. When loaded off-center, the internal-implant abutment connection produced less stress when compared with the external-implant abutment connection. © 2011 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Pattapon Asvanund Steven M. Morgano |
format |
Article |
author |
Pattapon Asvanund Steven M. Morgano |
author_sort |
Pattapon Asvanund |
title |
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
title_short |
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
title_full |
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
title_fullStr |
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
title_sort |
photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11821 |
_version_ |
1763487761924358144 |