Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah
Mountain headwater catchments in the semi-arid Intermountain West are important sources of surface water because these high elevations receive more precipitation than neighboring lowlands. This study examined subsurface runoff in two hillslopes, one aspen dominated, the other conifer dominated, adja...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11928 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.11928 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.119282018-05-03T15:13:02Z Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah Amy R. Burke Tamao Kasahara Utah State University United States Department of Agriculture Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University Environmental Science Mountain headwater catchments in the semi-arid Intermountain West are important sources of surface water because these high elevations receive more precipitation than neighboring lowlands. This study examined subsurface runoff in two hillslopes, one aspen dominated, the other conifer dominated, adjacent to a first order stream in snow-driven northern Utah. Snow accumulation, soil moisture, trenchflow and streamflow were examined in hillslopes and their adjacent stream. Snow water equivalents (SWEs) were greater under aspen stands compared to conifer, the difference increasing with higher annual precipitation. Semi-variograms of shallow spatial soil moisture patterns and transects of continuous soil moisture showed no increase in soil moisture downslope, suggesting the absence of subsurface flow in shallow (∼12 cm) soil layers of either vegetation type. However, a clear threshold relationship between soil moisture and streamflow indicated hillslope-stream connectivity, deeper within the soil profile. Subsurface flow was detected at ∼50 cm depth, which was sustained for longer in the conifer hillslope. Soil profiles under the two vegetation types varied, with deep aspen soils having greater water storage capacity than shallow rocky conifer soils. Though SWEs were less under the conifers, the soil profile had less water storage capacity and produced more subsurface lateral flow during the spring snowmelt. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2018-05-03T08:13:02Z 2018-05-03T08:13:02Z 2011-04-30 Article Hydrological Processes. Vol.25, No.9 (2011), 1407-1417 10.1002/hyp.7906 10991085 08856087 2-s2.0-79954564473 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11928 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79954564473&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Environmental Science |
spellingShingle |
Environmental Science Amy R. Burke Tamao Kasahara Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah |
description |
Mountain headwater catchments in the semi-arid Intermountain West are important sources of surface water because these high elevations receive more precipitation than neighboring lowlands. This study examined subsurface runoff in two hillslopes, one aspen dominated, the other conifer dominated, adjacent to a first order stream in snow-driven northern Utah. Snow accumulation, soil moisture, trenchflow and streamflow were examined in hillslopes and their adjacent stream. Snow water equivalents (SWEs) were greater under aspen stands compared to conifer, the difference increasing with higher annual precipitation. Semi-variograms of shallow spatial soil moisture patterns and transects of continuous soil moisture showed no increase in soil moisture downslope, suggesting the absence of subsurface flow in shallow (∼12 cm) soil layers of either vegetation type. However, a clear threshold relationship between soil moisture and streamflow indicated hillslope-stream connectivity, deeper within the soil profile. Subsurface flow was detected at ∼50 cm depth, which was sustained for longer in the conifer hillslope. Soil profiles under the two vegetation types varied, with deep aspen soils having greater water storage capacity than shallow rocky conifer soils. Though SWEs were less under the conifers, the soil profile had less water storage capacity and produced more subsurface lateral flow during the spring snowmelt. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
author2 |
Utah State University |
author_facet |
Utah State University Amy R. Burke Tamao Kasahara |
format |
Article |
author |
Amy R. Burke Tamao Kasahara |
author_sort |
Amy R. Burke |
title |
Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah |
title_short |
Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah |
title_full |
Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah |
title_fullStr |
Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah |
title_full_unstemmed |
Subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern Utah |
title_sort |
subsurface lateral flow generation in aspen and conifer-dominated hillslopes of a first order catchment in northern utah |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11928 |
_version_ |
1763489595113078784 |