64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access

Objective: To compare multidetector row computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of vascular access stenoses in hemodialysis patients. Materials and methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients were imaged with MDCT angiography and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jitladda Wasinrat, Thanongchai Siriapisith, Somrach Thamtorawat, Trongtum Tongdee
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12727
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.12727
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.127272018-05-03T15:37:56Z 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access Jitladda Wasinrat Thanongchai Siriapisith Somrach Thamtorawat Trongtum Tongdee Mahidol University Medicine Objective: To compare multidetector row computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of vascular access stenoses in hemodialysis patients. Materials and methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients were imaged with MDCT angiography and subsequent DSA. The superficial vein of leg was used as the route for intravenous administration. The vascular stenosis was assessed in not significant ( < 50% stenosis), moderate stenosis (50%-74% stenosis), severe stenosis (75%-99%), and total occlusion (100%). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated for significant vascular stenosis using DSA as the standard reference. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT angiography for the detection of significant hemodialysis vascular access were 100% (95% CI, 89.3%-100%) and 94.8% (95% CI, 89.1%-97.6%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.2% (95% CI, 68.1%-93.4%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.8%-100%), respectively. The accuracy of MDCT angiography for detection of significant stenoses was 95.9% (95% CI, 91.4%-97.0%). Conclusions: MDCT angiography provides excellent correlation in vascular stenosis as compared with DSA in hemodialysis access. Complete assessment of entire vascular segments could be performing with MDCT angiography in planning before endovascular intervention or surgical correction. © The Author(s) 2011. 2018-05-03T08:37:56Z 2018-05-03T08:37:56Z 2011-01-01 Article Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. Vol.45, No.1 (2011), 69-77 10.1177/1538574410379922 15385744 2-s2.0-78650849721 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12727 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78650849721&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Jitladda Wasinrat
Thanongchai Siriapisith
Somrach Thamtorawat
Trongtum Tongdee
64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
description Objective: To compare multidetector row computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of vascular access stenoses in hemodialysis patients. Materials and methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients were imaged with MDCT angiography and subsequent DSA. The superficial vein of leg was used as the route for intravenous administration. The vascular stenosis was assessed in not significant ( < 50% stenosis), moderate stenosis (50%-74% stenosis), severe stenosis (75%-99%), and total occlusion (100%). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated for significant vascular stenosis using DSA as the standard reference. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT angiography for the detection of significant hemodialysis vascular access were 100% (95% CI, 89.3%-100%) and 94.8% (95% CI, 89.1%-97.6%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.2% (95% CI, 68.1%-93.4%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.8%-100%), respectively. The accuracy of MDCT angiography for detection of significant stenoses was 95.9% (95% CI, 91.4%-97.0%). Conclusions: MDCT angiography provides excellent correlation in vascular stenosis as compared with DSA in hemodialysis access. Complete assessment of entire vascular segments could be performing with MDCT angiography in planning before endovascular intervention or surgical correction. © The Author(s) 2011.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Jitladda Wasinrat
Thanongchai Siriapisith
Somrach Thamtorawat
Trongtum Tongdee
format Article
author Jitladda Wasinrat
Thanongchai Siriapisith
Somrach Thamtorawat
Trongtum Tongdee
author_sort Jitladda Wasinrat
title 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
title_short 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
title_full 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
title_fullStr 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
title_full_unstemmed 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
title_sort 64-slice mdct angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12727
_version_ 1763491047504084992