The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study

Objective: To compare the operative outcome of carpal tunnel release between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique (group A) with standard open carpal tunnel release (group B). Material and Method: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the present study. A s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sorasak Suppaphol, Patarawan Worathanarat, Viroj Kawinwongkovit, Preecha Pittayawutwinit
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/14871
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.14871
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.148712018-06-11T12:13:29Z The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study Sorasak Suppaphol Patarawan Worathanarat Viroj Kawinwongkovit Preecha Pittayawutwinit Mahidol University Burapha University Medicine Objective: To compare the operative outcome of carpal tunnel release between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique (group A) with standard open carpal tunnel release (group B). Material and Method: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the present study. A single blind randomized control trial study was conducted to compare the postoperative results between group A and B. The study parameters were Levine's symptom severity and functional score, grip and pinch strength, and average two-point discrimination. Results: The postoperative results between two groups were comparable with no statistical significance. Only grip strength at three months follow up was significantly greater in group A than in group B. Conclusion: The limited open carpal tunnel release in the present study is effective comparable to the standard open carpal tunnel release. The others advantage of this technique are better cosmesis and improvement in grip strength at the three months postoperative period. 2018-06-11T05:13:29Z 2018-06-11T05:13:29Z 2012-04-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.95, No.4 (2012), 532-536 01252208 2-s2.0-84859723804 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/14871 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859723804&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Sorasak Suppaphol
Patarawan Worathanarat
Viroj Kawinwongkovit
Preecha Pittayawutwinit
The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study
description Objective: To compare the operative outcome of carpal tunnel release between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique (group A) with standard open carpal tunnel release (group B). Material and Method: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the present study. A single blind randomized control trial study was conducted to compare the postoperative results between group A and B. The study parameters were Levine's symptom severity and functional score, grip and pinch strength, and average two-point discrimination. Results: The postoperative results between two groups were comparable with no statistical significance. Only grip strength at three months follow up was significantly greater in group A than in group B. Conclusion: The limited open carpal tunnel release in the present study is effective comparable to the standard open carpal tunnel release. The others advantage of this technique are better cosmesis and improvement in grip strength at the three months postoperative period.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Sorasak Suppaphol
Patarawan Worathanarat
Viroj Kawinwongkovit
Preecha Pittayawutwinit
format Article
author Sorasak Suppaphol
Patarawan Worathanarat
Viroj Kawinwongkovit
Preecha Pittayawutwinit
author_sort Sorasak Suppaphol
title The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study
title_short The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study
title_full The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study
title_fullStr The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial study
title_sort comparison between limited open carpal tunnel release using direct vision and tunneling technique and standard open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial study
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/14871
_version_ 1763489026714632192