Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/15071 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.15071 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.150712018-06-11T12:19:16Z Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis Amphan Chalermchockchareonkit Putthawan Tekasakul Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana Korakot Sirimai Noraziana Wahab Mahidol University International Islamic University Malaysia Medicine Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes-including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion-were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1 ± 48.7 minutes and 139.9 ± 52.4 minutes, respectively; P < 0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6 ± 255.1 mL versus 760.9 ± 633.2 mL [P < 0.001]; 3.5 ± 1.1 days versus 6.4 ± 3.0 days [P < 0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [P < 0.001], respectively). Conclusion: Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy. © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2018-06-11T05:19:16Z 2018-06-11T05:19:16Z 2012-01-01 Article International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Vol.116, No.2 (2012), 109-111 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022 18793479 00207292 2-s2.0-84355166519 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/15071 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84355166519&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Amphan Chalermchockchareonkit Putthawan Tekasakul Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana Korakot Sirimai Noraziana Wahab Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
description |
Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes-including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion-were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1 ± 48.7 minutes and 139.9 ± 52.4 minutes, respectively; P < 0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6 ± 255.1 mL versus 760.9 ± 633.2 mL [P < 0.001]; 3.5 ± 1.1 days versus 6.4 ± 3.0 days [P < 0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [P < 0.001], respectively). Conclusion: Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy. © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Amphan Chalermchockchareonkit Putthawan Tekasakul Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana Korakot Sirimai Noraziana Wahab |
format |
Article |
author |
Amphan Chalermchockchareonkit Putthawan Tekasakul Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana Korakot Sirimai Noraziana Wahab |
author_sort |
Amphan Chalermchockchareonkit |
title |
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
title_short |
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
title_full |
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
title_fullStr |
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
title_sort |
laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/15071 |
_version_ |
1763488989093822464 |