Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand

During 1999-2000, kidney tissues of approximately 15% of 1,310 rodents trapped from northeastern provinces of Thailand were tested for the presence of leptospires. Our direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) for detection of leptospires showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity with the culture data....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galayanee Doungchawee, Duangporn Phulsuksombat, Pimjai Naigowit, Yuvaluk Khoaprasert, Noppadon Sangjun, Suraphol Kongtim, Lee Smythe
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Review
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16774
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.16774
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.167742018-06-21T15:21:44Z Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand Galayanee Doungchawee Duangporn Phulsuksombat Pimjai Naigowit Yuvaluk Khoaprasert Noppadon Sangjun Suraphol Kongtim Lee Smythe Mahidol University Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Thailand National Institutes of Health, Bethesda Agricultural Zoology Research Group, Thailand Department of Agriculture Queensland Health Medicine During 1999-2000, kidney tissues of approximately 15% of 1,310 rodents trapped from northeastern provinces of Thailand were tested for the presence of leptospires. Our direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) for detection of leptospires showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity with the culture data. Both methods identified R. norvegicus as the highest source of infection. Among isolated Leptospira, 137 were serotyped by cross agglutinin absorption and/or a microscopic agglutination, and gave some variations and similarities at the serovar level to the DFA results. DFA data demonstrated over half of the positive animals were infected with several serovars of Leptospira interrogans. A subsequent DFA study in Bangkok in 2002 revealed leptospiral infection in 33% of 42 rats and shrews. The most common infecting serovars were Autumnalis and Canicola identified in rural and urban animals, respectively. This finding suggests that wild small mammals may act as important sources of pathogenic leptospires and warrant active surveillance to understand the epidemiology of transmission and control of carrier animals. 2018-06-21T08:21:44Z 2018-06-21T08:21:44Z 2005-11-01 Review Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. Vol.36, No.6 (2005), 1516-1522 01251562 2-s2.0-33645027385 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16774 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33645027385&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Galayanee Doungchawee
Duangporn Phulsuksombat
Pimjai Naigowit
Yuvaluk Khoaprasert
Noppadon Sangjun
Suraphol Kongtim
Lee Smythe
Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
description During 1999-2000, kidney tissues of approximately 15% of 1,310 rodents trapped from northeastern provinces of Thailand were tested for the presence of leptospires. Our direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) for detection of leptospires showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity with the culture data. Both methods identified R. norvegicus as the highest source of infection. Among isolated Leptospira, 137 were serotyped by cross agglutinin absorption and/or a microscopic agglutination, and gave some variations and similarities at the serovar level to the DFA results. DFA data demonstrated over half of the positive animals were infected with several serovars of Leptospira interrogans. A subsequent DFA study in Bangkok in 2002 revealed leptospiral infection in 33% of 42 rats and shrews. The most common infecting serovars were Autumnalis and Canicola identified in rural and urban animals, respectively. This finding suggests that wild small mammals may act as important sources of pathogenic leptospires and warrant active surveillance to understand the epidemiology of transmission and control of carrier animals.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Galayanee Doungchawee
Duangporn Phulsuksombat
Pimjai Naigowit
Yuvaluk Khoaprasert
Noppadon Sangjun
Suraphol Kongtim
Lee Smythe
format Review
author Galayanee Doungchawee
Duangporn Phulsuksombat
Pimjai Naigowit
Yuvaluk Khoaprasert
Noppadon Sangjun
Suraphol Kongtim
Lee Smythe
author_sort Galayanee Doungchawee
title Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
title_short Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
title_full Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
title_fullStr Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
title_sort survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in thailand
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16774
_version_ 1763494348669845504