Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand
During 1999-2000, kidney tissues of approximately 15% of 1,310 rodents trapped from northeastern provinces of Thailand were tested for the presence of leptospires. Our direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) for detection of leptospires showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity with the culture data....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Review |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16774 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.16774 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.167742018-06-21T15:21:44Z Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand Galayanee Doungchawee Duangporn Phulsuksombat Pimjai Naigowit Yuvaluk Khoaprasert Noppadon Sangjun Suraphol Kongtim Lee Smythe Mahidol University Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Thailand National Institutes of Health, Bethesda Agricultural Zoology Research Group, Thailand Department of Agriculture Queensland Health Medicine During 1999-2000, kidney tissues of approximately 15% of 1,310 rodents trapped from northeastern provinces of Thailand were tested for the presence of leptospires. Our direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) for detection of leptospires showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity with the culture data. Both methods identified R. norvegicus as the highest source of infection. Among isolated Leptospira, 137 were serotyped by cross agglutinin absorption and/or a microscopic agglutination, and gave some variations and similarities at the serovar level to the DFA results. DFA data demonstrated over half of the positive animals were infected with several serovars of Leptospira interrogans. A subsequent DFA study in Bangkok in 2002 revealed leptospiral infection in 33% of 42 rats and shrews. The most common infecting serovars were Autumnalis and Canicola identified in rural and urban animals, respectively. This finding suggests that wild small mammals may act as important sources of pathogenic leptospires and warrant active surveillance to understand the epidemiology of transmission and control of carrier animals. 2018-06-21T08:21:44Z 2018-06-21T08:21:44Z 2005-11-01 Review Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. Vol.36, No.6 (2005), 1516-1522 01251562 2-s2.0-33645027385 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16774 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33645027385&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Galayanee Doungchawee Duangporn Phulsuksombat Pimjai Naigowit Yuvaluk Khoaprasert Noppadon Sangjun Suraphol Kongtim Lee Smythe Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand |
description |
During 1999-2000, kidney tissues of approximately 15% of 1,310 rodents trapped from northeastern provinces of Thailand were tested for the presence of leptospires. Our direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) for detection of leptospires showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity with the culture data. Both methods identified R. norvegicus as the highest source of infection. Among isolated Leptospira, 137 were serotyped by cross agglutinin absorption and/or a microscopic agglutination, and gave some variations and similarities at the serovar level to the DFA results. DFA data demonstrated over half of the positive animals were infected with several serovars of Leptospira interrogans. A subsequent DFA study in Bangkok in 2002 revealed leptospiral infection in 33% of 42 rats and shrews. The most common infecting serovars were Autumnalis and Canicola identified in rural and urban animals, respectively. This finding suggests that wild small mammals may act as important sources of pathogenic leptospires and warrant active surveillance to understand the epidemiology of transmission and control of carrier animals. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Galayanee Doungchawee Duangporn Phulsuksombat Pimjai Naigowit Yuvaluk Khoaprasert Noppadon Sangjun Suraphol Kongtim Lee Smythe |
format |
Review |
author |
Galayanee Doungchawee Duangporn Phulsuksombat Pimjai Naigowit Yuvaluk Khoaprasert Noppadon Sangjun Suraphol Kongtim Lee Smythe |
author_sort |
Galayanee Doungchawee |
title |
Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand |
title_short |
Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand |
title_full |
Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand |
title_fullStr |
Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed |
Survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in Thailand |
title_sort |
survey of leptospirosis of small mammals in thailand |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16774 |
_version_ |
1763494348669845504 |