Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Introduction: Quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been a discussed issue among patients. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP) has been shown to provide the best surgical outcomes in terms of potency and continence. The program of robotic prostatectomy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sittiporn Srinualnad
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/19736
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.19736
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.197362018-07-12T09:45:20Z Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Sittiporn Srinualnad Mahidol University Siriraj Hospital Medicine Introduction: Quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been a discussed issue among patients. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP) has been shown to provide the best surgical outcomes in terms of potency and continence. The program of robotic prostatectomy was started at Siriraj Hospital. Early result of the author's experience was evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy done at Siriraj Hospital. Material and Method: From March 2007 to November 2007, 34 patients (Group 1) with localized prostate cancer underwent Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP). Perioperative data was evaluated and compared to those of 34 patients (group 2) who underwent Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) during the same period by the same surgeon. Results: There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Catheterization time was significantly shortened in the RALRP group (p < 0.05). There was no major complication in the RALRP group, one LRP patient suffered bilateral ureteric injuries and required bilateral reimplantation. In pathological T2 patients of the last 17 consecutive cases, positive surgical margin rate was similar (14%) in both groups. Conclusion: The author early experience has shown that RALRP is feasible and safe. Oncological outcome can be improved with more experience and long term follow up is needed to evaluate functional outcome including potency rate and incontinence rate. 2018-07-12T02:45:20Z 2018-07-12T02:45:20Z 2008-03-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.91, No.3 (2008), 377-382 01252208 01252208 2-s2.0-41749104000 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/19736 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=41749104000&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Sittiporn Srinualnad
Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
description Introduction: Quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been a discussed issue among patients. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP) has been shown to provide the best surgical outcomes in terms of potency and continence. The program of robotic prostatectomy was started at Siriraj Hospital. Early result of the author's experience was evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy done at Siriraj Hospital. Material and Method: From March 2007 to November 2007, 34 patients (Group 1) with localized prostate cancer underwent Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP). Perioperative data was evaluated and compared to those of 34 patients (group 2) who underwent Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) during the same period by the same surgeon. Results: There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Catheterization time was significantly shortened in the RALRP group (p < 0.05). There was no major complication in the RALRP group, one LRP patient suffered bilateral ureteric injuries and required bilateral reimplantation. In pathological T2 patients of the last 17 consecutive cases, positive surgical margin rate was similar (14%) in both groups. Conclusion: The author early experience has shown that RALRP is feasible and safe. Oncological outcome can be improved with more experience and long term follow up is needed to evaluate functional outcome including potency rate and incontinence rate.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Sittiporn Srinualnad
format Article
author Sittiporn Srinualnad
author_sort Sittiporn Srinualnad
title Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_short Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_sort early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/19736
_version_ 1763492474757578752