A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.

Antibody to double-stranded DNA is a specific marker for systemic lupus erythematosus. The recommended method for detection of this antibody is immunofluorescence. Haemagglutination was developed and the results of antibody detection were evaluated with those obtained by immunofluorescence. Human gr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Niemhom, B. Petchclai, M. Vanichapuntu
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.22159
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.221592018-08-10T15:34:20Z A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid. S. Niemhom B. Petchclai M. Vanichapuntu Mahidol University Medicine Antibody to double-stranded DNA is a specific marker for systemic lupus erythematosus. The recommended method for detection of this antibody is immunofluorescence. Haemagglutination was developed and the results of antibody detection were evaluated with those obtained by immunofluorescence. Human group O erythrocytes were treated with glutaraldehyde and coated with DNA from calf thymus. Testing in 169 active and inactive SLE sera, 59 sera were positive and 91 sera were negative by both methods. Five sera were negative by haemagglutination but positive by immunofluorescence. Fourteen sera with low haemagglutination titer were negative by immunofluorescence. The correlation between the results obtained by both methods were highly significance with contingency coefficient of 0.61 and correlation coefficient between the results of 78 sera positive by both or either method was 0.74 (p less than 0.001). Sixty-three sera from blood donors and seventy sera from pregnant women were negative by the two techniques. PHA is simpler, quicker and can be assayed in laboratories without the use of fluorescent microscope. It can be established as a very useful alternative test to immunofluorescence. 2018-08-10T08:34:20Z 2018-08-10T08:34:20Z 1991-03-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.74, No.3 (1991), 145-148 01252208 2-s2.0-0026130029 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22159 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026130029&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
S. Niemhom
B. Petchclai
M. Vanichapuntu
A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
description Antibody to double-stranded DNA is a specific marker for systemic lupus erythematosus. The recommended method for detection of this antibody is immunofluorescence. Haemagglutination was developed and the results of antibody detection were evaluated with those obtained by immunofluorescence. Human group O erythrocytes were treated with glutaraldehyde and coated with DNA from calf thymus. Testing in 169 active and inactive SLE sera, 59 sera were positive and 91 sera were negative by both methods. Five sera were negative by haemagglutination but positive by immunofluorescence. Fourteen sera with low haemagglutination titer were negative by immunofluorescence. The correlation between the results obtained by both methods were highly significance with contingency coefficient of 0.61 and correlation coefficient between the results of 78 sera positive by both or either method was 0.74 (p less than 0.001). Sixty-three sera from blood donors and seventy sera from pregnant women were negative by the two techniques. PHA is simpler, quicker and can be assayed in laboratories without the use of fluorescent microscope. It can be established as a very useful alternative test to immunofluorescence.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
S. Niemhom
B. Petchclai
M. Vanichapuntu
format Article
author S. Niemhom
B. Petchclai
M. Vanichapuntu
author_sort S. Niemhom
title A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
title_short A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
title_full A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
title_fullStr A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
title_sort comparison of passive haemagglutination test and immunofluorescent test for antibody to native deoxyribonucleic acid.
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22159
_version_ 1763492387604135936