Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples
A small survey to assess the perception and experience of current family planning users and their husbands was carried out in a university family planning clinic. Women routinely visiting the clinic were asked to complete a short Screening Form. Fifty-six women responded to the questionnaire concern...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22177 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.22177 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.221772018-08-10T15:34:42Z Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples Supanee Jivasak-Apimas Mahidol University Medicine A small survey to assess the perception and experience of current family planning users and their husbands was carried out in a university family planning clinic. Women routinely visiting the clinic were asked to complete a short Screening Form. Fifty-six women responded to the questionnaire concerning their attitude to the Femshield. Eighteen volunteers agreed to enter the study and were given verbal instruction on use of the device. Each volunteer was provided with 3-5 Femshields. Participants were asked to return to the clinic one month after admission. A Husband Form was then sent to the home of the volunteers to assess the attitude of their husbands. Thirteen volunteers returned for the follow-up visit. Fifty Femshields were used. The results showed that the volunteers found the vaginal insertion of the device was acceptable, but the outer and inner rings of the device caused an uncomfortable feeling when having intercourse. The volunteers were more positive to the device than their spouses. The sexual satisfaction of both partners was reduced. A few couples suggested that the device be modified with the bag being smaller and thinner, the outer and inner rings reduced in size and softer, and the device itself being in a prelubricated packet. © 1991. 2018-08-10T08:34:42Z 2018-08-10T08:34:42Z 1991-01-01 Article Contraception. Vol.44, No.2 (1991), 183-190 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90118-Y 00107824 2-s2.0-0026039137 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22177 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026039137&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Supanee Jivasak-Apimas Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples |
description |
A small survey to assess the perception and experience of current family planning users and their husbands was carried out in a university family planning clinic. Women routinely visiting the clinic were asked to complete a short Screening Form. Fifty-six women responded to the questionnaire concerning their attitude to the Femshield. Eighteen volunteers agreed to enter the study and were given verbal instruction on use of the device. Each volunteer was provided with 3-5 Femshields. Participants were asked to return to the clinic one month after admission. A Husband Form was then sent to the home of the volunteers to assess the attitude of their husbands. Thirteen volunteers returned for the follow-up visit. Fifty Femshields were used. The results showed that the volunteers found the vaginal insertion of the device was acceptable, but the outer and inner rings of the device caused an uncomfortable feeling when having intercourse. The volunteers were more positive to the device than their spouses. The sexual satisfaction of both partners was reduced. A few couples suggested that the device be modified with the bag being smaller and thinner, the outer and inner rings reduced in size and softer, and the device itself being in a prelubricated packet. © 1991. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Supanee Jivasak-Apimas |
format |
Article |
author |
Supanee Jivasak-Apimas |
author_sort |
Supanee Jivasak-Apimas |
title |
Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples |
title_short |
Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples |
title_full |
Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples |
title_fullStr |
Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * Chartex Resources Ltd., London, U.K.) in Thai couples |
title_sort |
acceptability of the vaginal sheath (femshield* * chartex resources ltd., london, u.k.) in thai couples |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22177 |
_version_ |
1763495230354489344 |