Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test

In this prospective study, comparisons were made between the results of fetal movement count as performed by either the attending staff or by the patients using the non stress test (NST). A total of 283 NSTs were performed in 200 patients who had singleton pregnancy of at least 32 weeks gestation wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Wilailak, S. Suthutvoravut, P. Cherng-sa-ad, Y. Herabutya, K. Chaturachinda
Other Authors: Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22438
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.22438
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.224382018-08-10T15:48:12Z Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test S. Wilailak S. Suthutvoravut P. Cherng-sa-ad Y. Herabutya K. Chaturachinda Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University Mahidol University Medicine In this prospective study, comparisons were made between the results of fetal movement count as performed by either the attending staff or by the patients using the non stress test (NST). A total of 283 NSTs were performed in 200 patients who had singleton pregnancy of at least 32 weeks gestation with indications for assessment of fetal well-being. Fetal movement counts performed by the attending staff and by the patients were recorded on 241 and 170 occasions, respectively. The results showed that the best correlation between fetal movement count by the attending staff with NST was when the criteria of three or more fetal movements within 10 min was used. Likewise, the best correlation between fetal movement count by patients with NST was found when ten fetal movements within 2 h was used as a cut off point. The result of this study suggests the usefulness of fetal movement count performed either by attending staff or patients as a cheap and effective method of screening for good fetal well-being in places where NST is not readily available and may also be used as a screening for patients prior to further evaluation. © 1992. 2018-08-10T08:48:12Z 2018-08-10T08:48:12Z 1992-01-01 Article International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Vol.39, No.1 (1992), 23-27 10.1016/0020-7292(92)90775-E 00207292 2-s2.0-0026669462 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22438 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026669462&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
S. Wilailak
S. Suthutvoravut
P. Cherng-sa-ad
Y. Herabutya
K. Chaturachinda
Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test
description In this prospective study, comparisons were made between the results of fetal movement count as performed by either the attending staff or by the patients using the non stress test (NST). A total of 283 NSTs were performed in 200 patients who had singleton pregnancy of at least 32 weeks gestation with indications for assessment of fetal well-being. Fetal movement counts performed by the attending staff and by the patients were recorded on 241 and 170 occasions, respectively. The results showed that the best correlation between fetal movement count by the attending staff with NST was when the criteria of three or more fetal movements within 10 min was used. Likewise, the best correlation between fetal movement count by patients with NST was found when ten fetal movements within 2 h was used as a cut off point. The result of this study suggests the usefulness of fetal movement count performed either by attending staff or patients as a cheap and effective method of screening for good fetal well-being in places where NST is not readily available and may also be used as a screening for patients prior to further evaluation. © 1992.
author2 Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
author_facet Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
S. Wilailak
S. Suthutvoravut
P. Cherng-sa-ad
Y. Herabutya
K. Chaturachinda
format Article
author S. Wilailak
S. Suthutvoravut
P. Cherng-sa-ad
Y. Herabutya
K. Chaturachinda
author_sort S. Wilailak
title Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test
title_short Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test
title_full Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test
title_fullStr Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of fetal well-being: Fetal movement count versus non stress test
title_sort assessment of fetal well-being: fetal movement count versus non stress test
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22438
_version_ 1763497529995952128