Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.

Donor self exclusion is a low technology procedure to avoid blood donations from the high-risk groups for HIV infection. This strategy has been widely used in western countries to reduce the risk of transfusion associated AIDS. At Ramathibodi Hospital, we conducted a study on donor self exclusion pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Chiewsilp, S. Kitkornpan, S. Stabunswadigan, W. Iamsilp, C. Suebsaeng
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22648
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.22648
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.226482018-08-10T15:56:53Z Evaluation of donor self exclusion program. P. Chiewsilp S. Kitkornpan S. Stabunswadigan W. Iamsilp C. Suebsaeng Mahidol University Medicine Donor self exclusion is a low technology procedure to avoid blood donations from the high-risk groups for HIV infection. This strategy has been widely used in western countries to reduce the risk of transfusion associated AIDS. At Ramathibodi Hospital, we conducted a study on donor self exclusion program during March-December 1991. It was found 2.60%-6.55% (mean = 4.59%) of a total of 4,286 units of blood that were from the donors who indicated that their blood may not be safe for transfusion while the rest of them declared that their blood was safe based on sexual behavior during the past 3 months and the history of intravenous drug use. Among 202 units of unsafe blood, there were 1 (0.49%) positive for HIV-Ag, 7 (3.46%) for anti-HIV, 5 (2.48%) for anti-HCV, 10 (4.95%) for HBsAg and 6 (2.97%) for VDRL while there was no HIV-Ag detected in 4,084 units of safe blood but 19 (0.46%) were positive for anti-HIV (p < 0.05), 65 (1.59%) for anti-HCV, 219 (5.36%) for HBsAg and 56 (1.37%) for VDRL. It was clearly demonstrated in this study that confidential self-exclusion or HIV-Ag testing would have eliminated this HIV-Ag reactive unit in the "window period" from transfusion, while the syphilis screening would not have had any value as a surrogate marker. However, self-exclusion programs are likely to prove too non-specific and need more time to educate the donors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) 2018-08-10T08:56:53Z 2018-08-10T08:56:53Z 1993-12-01 Article The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. Vol.24 Suppl 1, (1993), 130-132 01251562 2-s2.0-0027902509 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22648 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0027902509&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
P. Chiewsilp
S. Kitkornpan
S. Stabunswadigan
W. Iamsilp
C. Suebsaeng
Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
description Donor self exclusion is a low technology procedure to avoid blood donations from the high-risk groups for HIV infection. This strategy has been widely used in western countries to reduce the risk of transfusion associated AIDS. At Ramathibodi Hospital, we conducted a study on donor self exclusion program during March-December 1991. It was found 2.60%-6.55% (mean = 4.59%) of a total of 4,286 units of blood that were from the donors who indicated that their blood may not be safe for transfusion while the rest of them declared that their blood was safe based on sexual behavior during the past 3 months and the history of intravenous drug use. Among 202 units of unsafe blood, there were 1 (0.49%) positive for HIV-Ag, 7 (3.46%) for anti-HIV, 5 (2.48%) for anti-HCV, 10 (4.95%) for HBsAg and 6 (2.97%) for VDRL while there was no HIV-Ag detected in 4,084 units of safe blood but 19 (0.46%) were positive for anti-HIV (p < 0.05), 65 (1.59%) for anti-HCV, 219 (5.36%) for HBsAg and 56 (1.37%) for VDRL. It was clearly demonstrated in this study that confidential self-exclusion or HIV-Ag testing would have eliminated this HIV-Ag reactive unit in the "window period" from transfusion, while the syphilis screening would not have had any value as a surrogate marker. However, self-exclusion programs are likely to prove too non-specific and need more time to educate the donors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
P. Chiewsilp
S. Kitkornpan
S. Stabunswadigan
W. Iamsilp
C. Suebsaeng
format Article
author P. Chiewsilp
S. Kitkornpan
S. Stabunswadigan
W. Iamsilp
C. Suebsaeng
author_sort P. Chiewsilp
title Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
title_short Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
title_full Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
title_fullStr Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
title_sort evaluation of donor self exclusion program.
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22648
_version_ 1763489971434422272