Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method

Many standardized healthcare languages have been mapped to the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms known as SNOMED CT, which was developed by the College of American Pathologists. This study describes a methodology for detecting misassigned concepts from source systems to SNOMED CT...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Der Fa F Lu, David Eichmann, Debra Konicek, Hyun Tae Park, Prangtip Ucharattana, Connie Delaney
Other Authors: University of Iowa
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23198
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.23198
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.231982018-08-20T14:12:45Z Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method Der Fa F Lu David Eichmann Debra Konicek Hyun Tae Park Prangtip Ucharattana Connie Delaney University of Iowa College of American Pathologists Mahidol University Computer Science Health Professions Medicine Many standardized healthcare languages have been mapped to the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms known as SNOMED CT, which was developed by the College of American Pathologists. This study describes a methodology for detecting misassigned concepts from source systems to SNOMED CT and presents the results of applying this methodology to a subset of concepts from two standardized nursing languages, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcomes Classification. The methodology is based on comparing the knowledge representations of a set of nursing concepts between source systems (nursing languages) and SNOMED CT. If any nursing concept differs in knowledge representation in the target system compared with the source system, editorial misassignment of the concept was declared and recommendations for target system developers were made. In a total of 75 nursing concepts used to test this method, five misassigned concepts(6.6%) were found in SNOMED CT. This method can be used to validate other healthcare languages. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2018-08-20T06:57:15Z 2018-08-20T06:57:15Z 2006-09-01 Article CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing. Vol.24, No.5 (2006), 288-296 10.1097/00024665-200609000-00011 15382931 2-s2.0-33748804173 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23198 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33748804173&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Computer Science
Health Professions
Medicine
spellingShingle Computer Science
Health Professions
Medicine
Der Fa F Lu
David Eichmann
Debra Konicek
Hyun Tae Park
Prangtip Ucharattana
Connie Delaney
Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method
description Many standardized healthcare languages have been mapped to the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms known as SNOMED CT, which was developed by the College of American Pathologists. This study describes a methodology for detecting misassigned concepts from source systems to SNOMED CT and presents the results of applying this methodology to a subset of concepts from two standardized nursing languages, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcomes Classification. The methodology is based on comparing the knowledge representations of a set of nursing concepts between source systems (nursing languages) and SNOMED CT. If any nursing concept differs in knowledge representation in the target system compared with the source system, editorial misassignment of the concept was declared and recommendations for target system developers were made. In a total of 75 nursing concepts used to test this method, five misassigned concepts(6.6%) were found in SNOMED CT. This method can be used to validate other healthcare languages. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
author2 University of Iowa
author_facet University of Iowa
Der Fa F Lu
David Eichmann
Debra Konicek
Hyun Tae Park
Prangtip Ucharattana
Connie Delaney
format Article
author Der Fa F Lu
David Eichmann
Debra Konicek
Hyun Tae Park
Prangtip Ucharattana
Connie Delaney
author_sort Der Fa F Lu
title Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method
title_short Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method
title_full Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method
title_fullStr Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method
title_full_unstemmed Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method
title_sort standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: a cross-mapping validation method
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23198
_version_ 1763490774285025280