SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography

Purpose: The study was carried out to find optimal scanning parameters for an MDCT at Ramathibodi hospital. Method and materials: Two types of phantom were employed to assess image quality and standard ionization chamber was used to measure radiation dose. Tube current, slice thickness, pixel size a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Changkaew, N. Pongnapang
Other Authors: Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24277
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.24277
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.242772018-08-24T09:12:06Z SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography P. Changkaew N. Pongnapang Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University Mahidol University Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Medicine Purpose: The study was carried out to find optimal scanning parameters for an MDCT at Ramathibodi hospital. Method and materials: Two types of phantom were employed to assess image quality and standard ionization chamber was used to measure radiation dose. Tube current, slice thickness, pixel size and pitch were varied from routine techniques to evaluate factors affecting image quality (spatial resolution, contrast detectability and image noise) and dose (CTDIair) with aim of optimization. Results: From our study showed that, optimization of radiation dose and image quality could be achieved by proper selection of scanning parameters. Reduction of tube current could be made 22 – 28%, pitch could be doubled from 0.75 to 1.5 (50% dose reduction) in slice thickness less than 7.5 mm without any significant effects on noise and contrast. In examinations that do not require high spatial resolution, larger pixel size could be made and could result in 15 – 17% dose reduction. Conclusions: We concluded from our study that, optimal scanning parameters were 115, 105, 150 and 170 mA for head (above/below posterior fossa) and abdomen (pre‐ and post‐ contrast) protocols, respectively. Slice thickness should be made thinnest possible before the penumbra dose penalty becomes significant. Pitch and pixel size should be selected based on clinical requirements. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved. 2018-08-24T01:44:06Z 2018-08-24T01:44:06Z 2007-01-01 Article Medical Physics. Vol.34, No.6 (2007), 2344 10.1118/1.2760406 00942405 2-s2.0-85024807170 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24277 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85024807170&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
P. Changkaew
N. Pongnapang
SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography
description Purpose: The study was carried out to find optimal scanning parameters for an MDCT at Ramathibodi hospital. Method and materials: Two types of phantom were employed to assess image quality and standard ionization chamber was used to measure radiation dose. Tube current, slice thickness, pixel size and pitch were varied from routine techniques to evaluate factors affecting image quality (spatial resolution, contrast detectability and image noise) and dose (CTDIair) with aim of optimization. Results: From our study showed that, optimization of radiation dose and image quality could be achieved by proper selection of scanning parameters. Reduction of tube current could be made 22 – 28%, pitch could be doubled from 0.75 to 1.5 (50% dose reduction) in slice thickness less than 7.5 mm without any significant effects on noise and contrast. In examinations that do not require high spatial resolution, larger pixel size could be made and could result in 15 – 17% dose reduction. Conclusions: We concluded from our study that, optimal scanning parameters were 115, 105, 150 and 170 mA for head (above/below posterior fossa) and abdomen (pre‐ and post‐ contrast) protocols, respectively. Slice thickness should be made thinnest possible before the penumbra dose penalty becomes significant. Pitch and pixel size should be selected based on clinical requirements. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
author2 Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
author_facet Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
P. Changkaew
N. Pongnapang
format Article
author P. Changkaew
N. Pongnapang
author_sort P. Changkaew
title SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography
title_short SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography
title_full SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography
title_fullStr SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed SU‐FF‐I‐29: Optimizing Radiation Dose and Image Quality in a Multi‐Detector Computed Tomography
title_sort su‐ff‐i‐29: optimizing radiation dose and image quality in a multi‐detector computed tomography
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24277
_version_ 1763493183584468992