Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms is a reference terminology that can be used to cross-map standardized healthcare languages across healthcare disciplines. It is important to ensure that the knowledge represented in individual source systems has been preserved during the proce...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24905 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.24905 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.249052018-08-24T09:13:38Z Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation Der Fa Lu Hyun Tae Park Prangtip Ucharattana Debra Konicek Connie Delaney University of Iowa Mahidol University College of American Pathologists University of Minnesota Twin Cities Medicine Nursing The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms is a reference terminology that can be used to cross-map standardized healthcare languages across healthcare disciplines. It is important to ensure that the knowledge represented in individual source systems has been preserved during the process of cross-mapping to the target system. The purpose of this study was to validate the cross-mapping between the Nursing Outcomes Classification and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms. The methodology to detect incorrectly assigned (mis-assigned) concepts from the source system to the target system was developed by the authors. The methodology compared knowledge representations of Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in both systems by using human expert judgments. Each concept's meaning is defined by both the structures and definitions in the concept model. Sixteen (4.8%) mis-assigned Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms, and one inconsistent concept representation in the Nursing Outcomes Classification were found. Results and recommendations were given to both the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms developers for consideration of future system improvements. 2018-08-24T02:06:40Z 2018-08-24T02:06:40Z 2007-05-01 Article CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing. Vol.25, No.3 (2007), 159-170 10.1097/01.NCN.0000270042.22164.21 15382931 2-s2.0-34248530018 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24905 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34248530018&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine Nursing |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Nursing Der Fa Lu Hyun Tae Park Prangtip Ucharattana Debra Konicek Connie Delaney Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation |
description |
The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms is a reference terminology that can be used to cross-map standardized healthcare languages across healthcare disciplines. It is important to ensure that the knowledge represented in individual source systems has been preserved during the process of cross-mapping to the target system. The purpose of this study was to validate the cross-mapping between the Nursing Outcomes Classification and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms. The methodology to detect incorrectly assigned (mis-assigned) concepts from the source system to the target system was developed by the authors. The methodology compared knowledge representations of Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in both systems by using human expert judgments. Each concept's meaning is defined by both the structures and definitions in the concept model. Sixteen (4.8%) mis-assigned Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms, and one inconsistent concept representation in the Nursing Outcomes Classification were found. Results and recommendations were given to both the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms developers for consideration of future system improvements. |
author2 |
University of Iowa |
author_facet |
University of Iowa Der Fa Lu Hyun Tae Park Prangtip Ucharattana Debra Konicek Connie Delaney |
format |
Article |
author |
Der Fa Lu Hyun Tae Park Prangtip Ucharattana Debra Konicek Connie Delaney |
author_sort |
Der Fa Lu |
title |
Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation |
title_short |
Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation |
title_full |
Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation |
title_fullStr |
Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation |
title_sort |
nursing outcomes classification in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: a cross-mapping validation |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24905 |
_version_ |
1763491189938454528 |