Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation

The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms is a reference terminology that can be used to cross-map standardized healthcare languages across healthcare disciplines. It is important to ensure that the knowledge represented in individual source systems has been preserved during the proce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Der Fa Lu, Hyun Tae Park, Prangtip Ucharattana, Debra Konicek, Connie Delaney
Other Authors: University of Iowa
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24905
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.24905
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.249052018-08-24T09:13:38Z Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation Der Fa Lu Hyun Tae Park Prangtip Ucharattana Debra Konicek Connie Delaney University of Iowa Mahidol University College of American Pathologists University of Minnesota Twin Cities Medicine Nursing The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms is a reference terminology that can be used to cross-map standardized healthcare languages across healthcare disciplines. It is important to ensure that the knowledge represented in individual source systems has been preserved during the process of cross-mapping to the target system. The purpose of this study was to validate the cross-mapping between the Nursing Outcomes Classification and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms. The methodology to detect incorrectly assigned (mis-assigned) concepts from the source system to the target system was developed by the authors. The methodology compared knowledge representations of Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in both systems by using human expert judgments. Each concept's meaning is defined by both the structures and definitions in the concept model. Sixteen (4.8%) mis-assigned Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms, and one inconsistent concept representation in the Nursing Outcomes Classification were found. Results and recommendations were given to both the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms developers for consideration of future system improvements. 2018-08-24T02:06:40Z 2018-08-24T02:06:40Z 2007-05-01 Article CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing. Vol.25, No.3 (2007), 159-170 10.1097/01.NCN.0000270042.22164.21 15382931 2-s2.0-34248530018 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24905 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34248530018&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
Nursing
spellingShingle Medicine
Nursing
Der Fa Lu
Hyun Tae Park
Prangtip Ucharattana
Debra Konicek
Connie Delaney
Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
description The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms is a reference terminology that can be used to cross-map standardized healthcare languages across healthcare disciplines. It is important to ensure that the knowledge represented in individual source systems has been preserved during the process of cross-mapping to the target system. The purpose of this study was to validate the cross-mapping between the Nursing Outcomes Classification and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms. The methodology to detect incorrectly assigned (mis-assigned) concepts from the source system to the target system was developed by the authors. The methodology compared knowledge representations of Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in both systems by using human expert judgments. Each concept's meaning is defined by both the structures and definitions in the concept model. Sixteen (4.8%) mis-assigned Nursing Outcomes Classification concepts in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms, and one inconsistent concept representation in the Nursing Outcomes Classification were found. Results and recommendations were given to both the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms developers for consideration of future system improvements.
author2 University of Iowa
author_facet University of Iowa
Der Fa Lu
Hyun Tae Park
Prangtip Ucharattana
Debra Konicek
Connie Delaney
format Article
author Der Fa Lu
Hyun Tae Park
Prangtip Ucharattana
Debra Konicek
Connie Delaney
author_sort Der Fa Lu
title Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
title_short Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
title_full Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
title_fullStr Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
title_full_unstemmed Nursing outcomes classification in the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms: A cross-mapping validation
title_sort nursing outcomes classification in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: a cross-mapping validation
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24905
_version_ 1763491189938454528