Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets in comparison with conventional DDT-spraying as a method of malaria control according to the patientsf perspective among migrant populations in a high-risk area along the Thai-Myanmar border in Thai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piyarat Butraporn, Pirom Kamolratanakul, Malinee Prasittisuk, Chusak Prasittisuk, Kaemthong Indaratna
Other Authors: Thailand Ministry of Public Health
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25595
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.25595
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.255952018-09-07T15:55:35Z Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective Piyarat Butraporn Pirom Kamolratanakul Malinee Prasittisuk Chusak Prasittisuk Kaemthong Indaratna Thailand Ministry of Public Health Chulalongkorn University Mahidol University Medicine The present study was undertaken to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets in comparison with conventional DDT-spraying as a method of malaria control according to the patientsf perspective among migrant populations in a high-risk area along the Thai-Myanmar border in Thailand. Ten hamlets comprising 243 houses with 948 inhabitants were given only treated nets. Twelve hamlets comprising 294 houses and 1,315 inhabitants represented the DDT-treated area and another six hamlets with 171 houses and 695 inhabitants served as controls. Information as to consumer costs was obtained by interviewing 3,214 patients seeking care at all levels of the health care system in the study area. Analysis showed that the impregnated-net program was more cost-effective than the DDT-spraying program or surveillance alone (US$ 0.59 vs US$ 0.74 vs US$ 0.79 per 1 case of prevented malaria). We conclude that in a high-risk area such as along the Thai-Myanmar border in western Thailand, integrating the use of impregnated nets with large-scale primary health care programs is likely to constitute the most cost-effective method for controlling malaria according to the patients' perspective. 2018-09-07T08:55:35Z 2018-09-07T08:55:35Z 1999-09-01 Article Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. Vol.30, No.3 (1999), 427-431 01251562 2-s2.0-0033186956 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25595 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033186956&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Piyarat Butraporn
Pirom Kamolratanakul
Malinee Prasittisuk
Chusak Prasittisuk
Kaemthong Indaratna
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective
description The present study was undertaken to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets in comparison with conventional DDT-spraying as a method of malaria control according to the patientsf perspective among migrant populations in a high-risk area along the Thai-Myanmar border in Thailand. Ten hamlets comprising 243 houses with 948 inhabitants were given only treated nets. Twelve hamlets comprising 294 houses and 1,315 inhabitants represented the DDT-treated area and another six hamlets with 171 houses and 695 inhabitants served as controls. Information as to consumer costs was obtained by interviewing 3,214 patients seeking care at all levels of the health care system in the study area. Analysis showed that the impregnated-net program was more cost-effective than the DDT-spraying program or surveillance alone (US$ 0.59 vs US$ 0.74 vs US$ 0.79 per 1 case of prevented malaria). We conclude that in a high-risk area such as along the Thai-Myanmar border in western Thailand, integrating the use of impregnated nets with large-scale primary health care programs is likely to constitute the most cost-effective method for controlling malaria according to the patients' perspective.
author2 Thailand Ministry of Public Health
author_facet Thailand Ministry of Public Health
Piyarat Butraporn
Pirom Kamolratanakul
Malinee Prasittisuk
Chusak Prasittisuk
Kaemthong Indaratna
format Article
author Piyarat Butraporn
Pirom Kamolratanakul
Malinee Prasittisuk
Chusak Prasittisuk
Kaemthong Indaratna
author_sort Piyarat Butraporn
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : The patients' perspective
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets for malaria control : the patients' perspective
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25595
_version_ 1763495946081009664