Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial

Objective: A prospective randomized trial was organized to compare the effectiveness of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S). Method: Three hundred and forty-one patients were randomized into the general anesthesia group (GA), epidural anesthesia group (EA) and spinal anesthesi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jariya Lertakyamanee, Thitima Chinachoti, Thara Tritrakarn, Jarinya Muangkasem, Achra Somboonnanonda, Thrathip Kolatat
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25617
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.25617
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.256172018-09-07T15:56:29Z Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial Jariya Lertakyamanee Thitima Chinachoti Thara Tritrakarn Jarinya Muangkasem Achra Somboonnanonda Thrathip Kolatat Mahidol University Medicine Objective: A prospective randomized trial was organized to compare the effectiveness of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S). Method: Three hundred and forty-one patients were randomized into the general anesthesia group (GA), epidural anesthesia group (EA) and spinal anesthesia group (SA). The effectiveness of interest was success rate, blood loss and patient satisfaction. Result: We found that the success rates of EA and SA were lower than GA. Success in EA should be improved by using an epidural catheter to add more local anesthetic drug instead of a single shot; and the surgeon should allow more time for the block to work adequately. Success is SA should be improved by using bupivacaine instead of lidocaine. GA resulted in significantly more blood loss, lower postoperative hematocrit, and higher proportion of patients who had postoperative hematocrit <30 per cent than EA and SA. The patients' satisfaction scores were not different among the 3 techniques. This meant that, given adequate explanation and perioperative care, Thai women were satisfied with regional anesthesia. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia is a better choice of anesthesia for C/S than general anesthesia. However, the availability of different techniques and ability to change the technique when needed were very useful and important. If GA is chosen, all safety procedures must be followed. Oxygen supplement and endotracheal intubation facilities must be available in all techniques. Guidelines of anesthesia for C/S at a national level should be agreed upon, including the type of personnel, monitoring equipment and postoperative care. 2018-09-07T08:56:29Z 2018-09-07T08:56:29Z 1999-07-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.82, No.7 (1999), 672-679 01252208 2-s2.0-0032722902 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25617 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032722902&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Jariya Lertakyamanee
Thitima Chinachoti
Thara Tritrakarn
Jarinya Muangkasem
Achra Somboonnanonda
Thrathip Kolatat
Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
description Objective: A prospective randomized trial was organized to compare the effectiveness of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S). Method: Three hundred and forty-one patients were randomized into the general anesthesia group (GA), epidural anesthesia group (EA) and spinal anesthesia group (SA). The effectiveness of interest was success rate, blood loss and patient satisfaction. Result: We found that the success rates of EA and SA were lower than GA. Success in EA should be improved by using an epidural catheter to add more local anesthetic drug instead of a single shot; and the surgeon should allow more time for the block to work adequately. Success is SA should be improved by using bupivacaine instead of lidocaine. GA resulted in significantly more blood loss, lower postoperative hematocrit, and higher proportion of patients who had postoperative hematocrit <30 per cent than EA and SA. The patients' satisfaction scores were not different among the 3 techniques. This meant that, given adequate explanation and perioperative care, Thai women were satisfied with regional anesthesia. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia is a better choice of anesthesia for C/S than general anesthesia. However, the availability of different techniques and ability to change the technique when needed were very useful and important. If GA is chosen, all safety procedures must be followed. Oxygen supplement and endotracheal intubation facilities must be available in all techniques. Guidelines of anesthesia for C/S at a national level should be agreed upon, including the type of personnel, monitoring equipment and postoperative care.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Jariya Lertakyamanee
Thitima Chinachoti
Thara Tritrakarn
Jarinya Muangkasem
Achra Somboonnanonda
Thrathip Kolatat
format Article
author Jariya Lertakyamanee
Thitima Chinachoti
Thara Tritrakarn
Jarinya Muangkasem
Achra Somboonnanonda
Thrathip Kolatat
author_sort Jariya Lertakyamanee
title Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
title_short Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
title_full Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
title_fullStr Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: Success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
title_sort comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25617
_version_ 1763492616715894784