Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic

With the natural history of the filovirus family seemingly unknown, filovirus ecology in its natural environment remains a rudimentary field of research. In order to investigate the maintenance cycle of filovirus in Central Africa, a study was conducted within the rain forest of the Central African...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean Paul Gonzalez, Emmanuel Nakoune, Werner Slenczka, Pierre Vidal, Jacques M. Morvan
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26010
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.26010
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.260102018-09-07T16:24:10Z Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic Jean Paul Gonzalez Emmanuel Nakoune Werner Slenczka Pierre Vidal Jacques M. Morvan Mahidol University Institut Pasteur de Bangui Institute für Virologie Min. des Affaires Etrangères Immunology and Microbiology Medicine With the natural history of the filovirus family seemingly unknown, filovirus ecology in its natural environment remains a rudimentary field of research. In order to investigate the maintenance cycle of filovirus in Central Africa, a study was conducted within the rain forest of the Central African Republic. The epidemiological study determines the frequency and distribution of filovirus seroprevalence in a selected human population. Using an ELISA, serum samples from Pygmy and non-Pygmy populations were tested for Ebola-Zaire virus and Marburg (MBG) virus antibody. Filovirus antibody reacting sera were found in all zones investigated, and in all populations studied (Ebola virus IgG 5.3%; Marburg virus IgG 2.4%). Pygmies appeared to have a significantly higher seroprevalence (P < 0.03) against Ebola-Zaire virus (7.02%) than non-Pygmies (4.2%). MBG virus or related unknown filovirus strains also seem to be present in the western part of Central Africa. MBG virus antibodies were present in different Pygmy groups (ranging from 0.7 to 5.6%, mean 2.05%) and in several non-Pygmy populations (ranging from 0.0 to 3.9%, mean 3.4%) without an overall significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.14). The potentialities of nonpathogenic filovirus strains circulating in the Central African Republic are discussed. (C) 2000 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS. 2018-09-07T09:12:50Z 2018-09-07T09:12:50Z 2000-01-01 Article Microbes and Infection. Vol.2, No.1 (2000), 39-44 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00287-2 12864579 2-s2.0-0033964327 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26010 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033964327&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Immunology and Microbiology
Medicine
spellingShingle Immunology and Microbiology
Medicine
Jean Paul Gonzalez
Emmanuel Nakoune
Werner Slenczka
Pierre Vidal
Jacques M. Morvan
Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic
description With the natural history of the filovirus family seemingly unknown, filovirus ecology in its natural environment remains a rudimentary field of research. In order to investigate the maintenance cycle of filovirus in Central Africa, a study was conducted within the rain forest of the Central African Republic. The epidemiological study determines the frequency and distribution of filovirus seroprevalence in a selected human population. Using an ELISA, serum samples from Pygmy and non-Pygmy populations were tested for Ebola-Zaire virus and Marburg (MBG) virus antibody. Filovirus antibody reacting sera were found in all zones investigated, and in all populations studied (Ebola virus IgG 5.3%; Marburg virus IgG 2.4%). Pygmies appeared to have a significantly higher seroprevalence (P < 0.03) against Ebola-Zaire virus (7.02%) than non-Pygmies (4.2%). MBG virus or related unknown filovirus strains also seem to be present in the western part of Central Africa. MBG virus antibodies were present in different Pygmy groups (ranging from 0.7 to 5.6%, mean 2.05%) and in several non-Pygmy populations (ranging from 0.0 to 3.9%, mean 3.4%) without an overall significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.14). The potentialities of nonpathogenic filovirus strains circulating in the Central African Republic are discussed. (C) 2000 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Jean Paul Gonzalez
Emmanuel Nakoune
Werner Slenczka
Pierre Vidal
Jacques M. Morvan
format Article
author Jean Paul Gonzalez
Emmanuel Nakoune
Werner Slenczka
Pierre Vidal
Jacques M. Morvan
author_sort Jean Paul Gonzalez
title Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic
title_short Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic
title_full Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic
title_fullStr Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic
title_full_unstemmed Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic
title_sort ebola and marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the central african republic
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26010
_version_ 1763497719527112704