A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight

The accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight was compared by an analytical cross sectional study. 266 pregnant women who were admitted to the labour room, Siriraj Hospital during the period from February 1, 1999 to March 1, 1999 were included in this study. Fetal weight was est...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vitaya Titapant, Saifon Chawanpaiboon, Kudkanang Mingmitpatanakul
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26723
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.26723
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.267232018-09-07T16:46:34Z A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight Vitaya Titapant Saifon Chawanpaiboon Kudkanang Mingmitpatanakul Mahidol University Medicine The accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight was compared by an analytical cross sectional study. 266 pregnant women who were admitted to the labour room, Siriraj Hospital during the period from February 1, 1999 to March 1, 1999 were included in this study. Fetal weight was estimated in all pregnant women clinically by 2nd year resident physicians and 6th year medical students, followed by ultrasound estimation within 24 hours before delivery. Every estimation was blinded from each other. From the study, clinical estimation by 2nd year resident physicians was comparable with ultrasound estimation and both were significantly more accurate than estimation by 6th year medical students. The proportions of accuracy were 66.7 per cent, 63.3 per cent and 55.3 per cent respectively. Clinical estimation by 2nd year resident physicians tended to have equally over- and underestimation. On the contrary, ultrasound estimation tended to underestimate when the method was inaccurate. Among infants with a birth weight less than 2,500 grams, ultrasound estimation performed slightly better than clinical estimation. However, every method underestimated the fetal weight when an infant weighed more than 4,000 grams. In conclusion, accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight by 2nd year resident physicians was comparable to that of ultrasound estimation and may be used as an alternative to ultrasound estimation for pregnant women. However, when the clinical estimate of fetal weight is less than 2,500 grams, ultrasound estimation should be performed for more accurate results and also for assessment of other abnormalities. Careful attention should be paid to infants with a birth weight of more than 4,000 grams since no method can correctly estimate the fetal weight and physicians should be aware of birth trauma. 2018-09-07T09:46:34Z 2018-09-07T09:46:34Z 2001-09-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.84, No.9 (2001), 1251-1257 01252208 2-s2.0-0035469220 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26723 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035469220&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Vitaya Titapant
Saifon Chawanpaiboon
Kudkanang Mingmitpatanakul
A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
description The accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight was compared by an analytical cross sectional study. 266 pregnant women who were admitted to the labour room, Siriraj Hospital during the period from February 1, 1999 to March 1, 1999 were included in this study. Fetal weight was estimated in all pregnant women clinically by 2nd year resident physicians and 6th year medical students, followed by ultrasound estimation within 24 hours before delivery. Every estimation was blinded from each other. From the study, clinical estimation by 2nd year resident physicians was comparable with ultrasound estimation and both were significantly more accurate than estimation by 6th year medical students. The proportions of accuracy were 66.7 per cent, 63.3 per cent and 55.3 per cent respectively. Clinical estimation by 2nd year resident physicians tended to have equally over- and underestimation. On the contrary, ultrasound estimation tended to underestimate when the method was inaccurate. Among infants with a birth weight less than 2,500 grams, ultrasound estimation performed slightly better than clinical estimation. However, every method underestimated the fetal weight when an infant weighed more than 4,000 grams. In conclusion, accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight by 2nd year resident physicians was comparable to that of ultrasound estimation and may be used as an alternative to ultrasound estimation for pregnant women. However, when the clinical estimate of fetal weight is less than 2,500 grams, ultrasound estimation should be performed for more accurate results and also for assessment of other abnormalities. Careful attention should be paid to infants with a birth weight of more than 4,000 grams since no method can correctly estimate the fetal weight and physicians should be aware of birth trauma.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Vitaya Titapant
Saifon Chawanpaiboon
Kudkanang Mingmitpatanakul
format Article
author Vitaya Titapant
Saifon Chawanpaiboon
Kudkanang Mingmitpatanakul
author_sort Vitaya Titapant
title A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
title_short A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
title_full A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
title_fullStr A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
title_sort comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26723
_version_ 1763497533705814016