Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1

It is generally believed that quiescent CD4+T cells are not susceptible to HIV-1 infection. However, infection of unstimulated peripheral mononuclear cells by syncytial-inducing (SI) viruses has been shown to be much more efficient than with nonsyncytial-inducing (NSI) viruses. This suggested that S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prasert Auewarakul, Suda Louisirirotchanakul, Surangrut Srisurapanon, Rassmeepen Phonarknguen, Ruengpung Sutthent
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26869
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.26869
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.268692018-09-07T16:51:27Z Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1 Prasert Auewarakul Suda Louisirirotchanakul Surangrut Srisurapanon Rassmeepen Phonarknguen Ruengpung Sutthent Mahidol University Medicine It is generally believed that quiescent CD4+T cells are not susceptible to HIV-1 infection. However, infection of unstimulated peripheral mononuclear cells by syncytial-inducing (SI) viruses has been shown to be much more efficient than with nonsyncytial-inducing (NSI) viruses. This suggested that SI, CXCR4-tropic viruses may be able to infect quiescent CD4+T cells. We studied the infection of highly purified quiescent CD4+T cells by SI and NSI viruses. In this article we show that although NSI viruses failed to significantly infect quiescent cells, SI viruses consistently infected these cells and produced viruses upon cellular activation by interleukin-2,2 to 7 days after initial infection.To examine whether the difference was the result of viral or host factors, we purified CCR5+quiescent CD4+T cells and showed that these cells can be infected by dual tropic (R5X4) but not by R5 virus. This indicated that CCR5+quiescent T cells were also susceptible to HIV-1 infection, and the failure of NSI, CCR5-tropic viruses to infect quiescent cells may be due to some intrinsic properties of these viruses. © 2001 The Japanese Society of Hematology. 2018-09-07T09:51:27Z 2018-09-07T09:51:27Z 2001-01-01 Article International Journal of Hematology. Vol.73, No.3 (2001), 335-338 10.1007/BF02981958 09255710 2-s2.0-0035316737 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26869 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035316737&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Prasert Auewarakul
Suda Louisirirotchanakul
Surangrut Srisurapanon
Rassmeepen Phonarknguen
Ruengpung Sutthent
Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1
description It is generally believed that quiescent CD4+T cells are not susceptible to HIV-1 infection. However, infection of unstimulated peripheral mononuclear cells by syncytial-inducing (SI) viruses has been shown to be much more efficient than with nonsyncytial-inducing (NSI) viruses. This suggested that SI, CXCR4-tropic viruses may be able to infect quiescent CD4+T cells. We studied the infection of highly purified quiescent CD4+T cells by SI and NSI viruses. In this article we show that although NSI viruses failed to significantly infect quiescent cells, SI viruses consistently infected these cells and produced viruses upon cellular activation by interleukin-2,2 to 7 days after initial infection.To examine whether the difference was the result of viral or host factors, we purified CCR5+quiescent CD4+T cells and showed that these cells can be infected by dual tropic (R5X4) but not by R5 virus. This indicated that CCR5+quiescent T cells were also susceptible to HIV-1 infection, and the failure of NSI, CCR5-tropic viruses to infect quiescent cells may be due to some intrinsic properties of these viruses. © 2001 The Japanese Society of Hematology.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Prasert Auewarakul
Suda Louisirirotchanakul
Surangrut Srisurapanon
Rassmeepen Phonarknguen
Ruengpung Sutthent
format Article
author Prasert Auewarakul
Suda Louisirirotchanakul
Surangrut Srisurapanon
Rassmeepen Phonarknguen
Ruengpung Sutthent
author_sort Prasert Auewarakul
title Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1
title_short Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1
title_full Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1
title_fullStr Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1
title_full_unstemmed Differential susceptibility of quiescent CD4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of HIV-1
title_sort differential susceptibility of quiescent cd4<sup>+</sup>lymphocytes to syncytial-inducing and non-syncytial-inducing isolates of hiv-1
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/26869
_version_ 1763497573886197760